List of quantum processors
This list contains quantum processors, also known as quantum processing units (QPUs). Some devices listed below have only been announced at press conferences so far, with no actual demonstrations or scientific publications characterizing the performance.
Circuit-based quantum processors
These QPUs are based on the quantum circuit and quantum logic gate-based model of computing.
Manufacturer | Name/Codename/Designation | Architecture | Layout | Socket | Fidelity | Qubits | Release date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N/A | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | 99.5%[1] | 20 qb | 2017 | |
N/A | Superconducting | 7×7 lattice | N/A | 99.7%[1] | 49 qb[2] | Q4 2017 (planned) | |
Bristlecone | Superconducting transmon | 6×12 lattice | N/A | 99% (readout) 99.9% (1 qubit) 99.4% (2 qubits) | 72 qb[3][4] | March 5, 2018 | |
Sycamore | Superconducting transmon | 9×6 lattice | N/A | N/A | 53 qb effective | 2019 | |
USTC | Jiuzhang | Photonics | N/A | N/A | N/A | 76 qb[5][6] | 2020 |
Xanadu | X8 [7] | Photonics | N/A | N/A | N/A | 8 qb | 2020 |
Xanadu | X12 | Photonics | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12 qb | 2020[7] |
Xanadu | X24 | Photonics | N/A | N/A | N/A | 24 qb | 2020[7] |
IBM | IBM Q 5 Tenerife | Superconducting | bow tie | N/A | 99.897% (average gate) 98.64% (readout) |
5 qb | 2016[1] |
IBM | IBM Q 5 Yorktown | Superconducting | bow tie | N/A | 99.545% (average gate) 94.2% (readout) |
5 qb | |
IBM | IBM Q 14 Melbourne | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | 99.735% (average gate) 97.13% (readout) |
14 qb | |
IBM | IBM Q 16 Rüschlikon | Superconducting | 2×8 lattice | N/A | 99.779% (average gate) 94.24% (readout) |
16 qb[8] | May 17, 2017 (Retired: 26 September 2018)[9] |
IBM | IBM Q 17 | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | N/A | 17 qb[8] | May 17, 2017 |
IBM | IBM Q 20 Tokyo | Superconducting | 5×4 lattice | N/A | 99.812% (average gate) 93.21% (readout) |
20 qb[10] | November 10, 2017 |
IBM | IBM Q 20 Austin | Superconducting | 5×4 lattice | N/A | N/A | 20 qb | (Retired: 4 July 2018)[9] |
IBM | IBM Q 50 prototype | Superconducting transmon | N/A | N/A | N/A | 50 qb[10] | |
IBM | IBM Q 53 | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | N/A | 53 qb | October 2019 |
IBM | IBM Eagle | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | N/A | 127 qubit | November 2021 |
Intel | 17-Qubit Superconducting Test Chip | Superconducting | N/A | 40-pin cross gap | N/A | 17 qb[11][12] | October 10, 2017 |
Intel | Tangle Lake | Superconducting | N/A | 108-pin cross gap | N/A | 49 qb[13] | January 9, 2018 |
Rigetti | 8Q Agave | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | N/A | 8 qb | June 4, 2018[14] |
Rigetti | 16Q Aspen-1 | Superconducting | N/A | N/A | N/A | 16 qb | November 30, 2018[14] |
Rigetti | 19Q Acorn | Superconducting transmon | N/A | N/A | N/A | 19 qb[15] | December 17, 2017 |
IBM | IBM Armonk[16] | Superconducting | Single Qubit | N/A | N/A | 1 qb | October 16, 2019 |
IBM | IBM Ourense[16] | Superconducting | T | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | July 3, 2019 |
IBM | IBM Vigo[16] | Superconducting | T | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | July 3, 2019 |
IBM | IBM London[16] | Superconducting | T | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | September 13, 2019 |
IBM | IBM Burlington[16] | Superconducting | T | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | September 13, 2019 |
IBM | IBM Essex[16] | Superconducting | T | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | September 13, 2019 |
IBM | IBM Athens [17] | Superconducting | QV32 [18] | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | |
IBM | IBM Belem[17] | Superconducting | QV16 | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | |
IBM | IBM Bogotá [17] | Superconducting | QV32 [18] | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | |
IBM | IBM Casablanca [17] | Superconducting | QV32 [18] | N/A | N/A | 7 qb | (Retired - March 2022) |
IBM | IBM Dublin [17] | Superconducting | QV64 | N/A | N/A | 27 qb | |
IBM | IBM Guadalupe [17] | Superconducting | QV32 [18] | N/A | N/A | 16 qb | |
IBM | IBM Kolkata | Superconducting | QV128 | N/A | N/A | 27 qb | |
IBM | IBM Lima [17] | Superconducting | QV8 | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | |
IBM | IBM Manhattan [17] | Superconducting | QV32 [18] | N/A | N/A | 65 qb | |
IBM | IBM Montreal [17] | Superconducting | QV128 | N/A | N/A | 27 qb | |
IBM | IBM Mumbai [17] | Superconducting | QV128 | N/A | N/A | 27 qb | |
IBM | IBM Paris [17] | Superconducting | QV32 [18] | N/A | N/A | 27 qb | |
IBM | IBM Quito [17] | Superconducting | QV16 | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | |
IBM | IBM Rome [17] | Superconducting | QV32 [18] | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | |
IBM | IBM Santiago [17] | Superconducting | QV32 [18] | N/A | N/A | 5 qb | |
IBM | IBM Sydney [17] | Superconducting | QV32 [18] | N/A | N/A | 27 qb | |
IBM | IBM Toronto [17] | Superconducting | QV32 [18] | N/A | N/A | 27 qb | |
QuTech at TU Delft | Spin-2 | Semiconductor spin qubits | 99% (average gate) 85%(readout)[19] |
2 qb | 2020 | ||
QuTech at TU Delft | Starmon-5 | Superconducting | X configuration | 97% (readout)[20] | 5 qb | 2020 | |
IonQ | Trapped ion | 32x1 chain[21] | N/A | 99.98% (1 qubit) 98.5-99.3% (2 qubit)[21] |
32 qb |
Annealing quantum processors
These QPUs are based on quantum annealing.
Manufacturer | Name/Codename/Designation | Architecture | Layout | Socket | Fidelity | Qubits | Release date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D-Wave | D-Wave One (Ranier) | Superconducting | C4 = Chimera(4,4,4)[22] = 4×4 K4,4 | N/A | N/A | 128 qb | 11 May 2011 |
D-Wave | D-Wave Two | Superconducting | C8 = Chimera(8,8,4)[22] = 8×8 K4,4 | N/A | N/A | 512 qb | 2013 |
D-Wave | D-Wave 2X | Superconducting | C12 = Chimera(12,12,4)[22][23] = 12×12 K4,4 | N/A | N/A | 1152 qb | 2015 |
D-Wave | D-Wave 2000Q | Superconducting | C16 = Chimera(16,16,4)[22] = 16×16 K4,4 | N/A | N/A | 2048 qb | 2017 |
D-Wave | D-Wave Advantage | Superconducting | Pegasus P16[24][25] | N/A | N/A | 5760 qb | 2020 |
References
- Lant, Karla (2017-06-23). "Google is Closer Than Ever to a Quantum Computer Breakthrough". Futurism. Retrieved 2017-10-18.
- Simonite, Tom (2017-04-21). "Google's New Chip Is a Stepping Stone to Quantum Computing Supremacy". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 2017-10-18.
- "A Preview of Bristlecone, Google's New Quantum Processor", Research (World wide web log), Google, March 2018.
- Greene, Tristan (2018-03-06). "Google reclaims quantum computer crown with 72 qubit processor". The Next Web. Retrieved 2018-06-27.
- Ball, Philip (2020-12-03). "Physicists in China challenge Google's 'quantum advantage'". Nature. 588 (7838): 380. Bibcode:2020Natur.588..380B. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-03434-7. PMID 33273711.
- December 2020, Rafi Letzter-Staff Writer 07 (7 December 2020). "China claims fastest quantum computer in the world". livescience.com. Retrieved 2020-12-19.
- "A new kind of quantum". spie.org. Retrieved 2021-01-09.
- "IBM Builds Its Most Powerful Universal Quantum Computing Processors". IBM. 2017-05-17. Retrieved 2017-10-18.
- "Quantum devices & simulators". IBM Q. 2018-06-05. Retrieved 2019-03-29.
- "IBM Announces Advances to IBM Quantum Systems & Ecosystem". 10 November 2017. Retrieved 10 November 2017.
- "Intel Delivers 17-Qubit Superconducting Chip with Advanced Packaging to QuTech". 2017-10-10. Retrieved 2017-10-18.
- Novet, Jordan (2017-10-10). "Intel shows off its latest chip for quantum computing as it looks past Moore's Law". CNBC. Retrieved 2017-10-18.
- "CES 2018: Intel's 49-Qubit Chip Shoots for Quantum Supremacy". 2018-01-09. Retrieved 2018-01-14.
- "QPU". Rigetti Computing. Retrieved 2019-03-24.
- "Unsupervised Machine Learning on Rigetti 19Q with Forest 1.2". 2017-12-18. Retrieved 2018-03-21.
- "IBM Q Experience". IBM Q Experience. Retrieved 2020-01-04.
- IBM Quantum. https://quantum-computing.ibm.com/, 2021
- IBM Research Blog. https://www.ibm.com/blogs/research/2020/07/qv32-performance/, 2021
- "Spin-2". Quantum Inspire. Retrieved 5 May 2021.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - "Starmon-5". Quantum Inspire. Retrieved 4 May 2021.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - arXiv:2009.11482
- Misha Denil and Nando de Freitas, Toward the Implementation of a Quantum RBM. In NIPS Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning Workshop, 2011
- https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332478892_Embedding_Equality_Constraints_of_Optimization_Problems_into_a_Quantum_Annealer
- Whittaker, Jed (2018-09-25). "System Roadmap" (PDF). D-Wave Systems. Retrieved 2020-02-17.
- Kelly Boothby, Paul Bunyk, Jack Raymond, and Aidan Roy, Next-Generation Topology of D-Wave Quantum Processors
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.