Humanitarian Cluster System
The Humanitarian Cluster System is a system, used by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, to coordinate multi-agency responses to large humanitarian emergencies.[1][2]

The system has been used since 2005 to improve the quality of humanitarian aid delivery.[3] The cluster system categorizes humanization activities into eleven work areas, and four cross-cutting themes, and identifies coordinating organizations for each of them.[3]
The coordination system has improved some aspects of humanitarian responses, and while it empowers international organizations, it also excludes local and national organizations, contrary to the widely accepted localisation agenda.[4]
History
.jpg.webp)
In 2004, Jan Egeland, the United Nations (UN) Emergency Response Coordinator commissioned a review of the operation of the international humanitarian system, known as the Humanitarian Reform Agenda.[4] The review identified gaps in coordination between United Nations, Red Cross and non-governmental humanitarian aid organizations.[4]
As a result of recommendations from that review, the cluster system was introduced in December 2005 to address the lack of coordination.[1][3]
Clusters
The clusters are defined and categorized by the Inter-Agency Standing Committee.[1] Each of the eleven clusters has one UN institution as a coordinator, with some having a secondary United Nations or non-UN coordinator, as follows:[1][3]
Cluster | Coordinating Institution(s) | Type |
---|---|---|
Camp Coordination and Camp Management | International Organization for Migration, and | Response |
Early Recovery | United Nations Development Programme | Response |
Education | UNICEF and Save the Children | Response |
Emergency Telecommunications | World Food Programme | Service |
Food Security | World Food Programme and Food and Agriculture Organization | Response |
Health | World Health Organization | Response |
Logistics | World Food Programme | Service |
Nutrition | UNICEF | Response |
Protection | United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees | Response |
Shelter | International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies and | Response |
Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Health | UNICEF | Response |
Clusters coordination is done by at meetings chaired by the coordination institution (above) as frequently as deemed necessary during an emergency: as often as daily or as infrequently as quarterly.[4]
Cross cutting themes
In addition to the eleven clusters, there are four identified cross-cutting themes, each with a coordinating agency or agencies, as follows:[4]
Issue | Coordinating institution(s) |
---|---|
Age | HelpAge International |
Environment | United Nations Environment Programme |
Gender | Which ever two agencies co-chair the Inter-Agency Standing Committee sub-working group on gender |
HIV/AIDS | UNAIDS |
Cluster coordination
The purpose of cluster meetings is for agencies to share information, including information about unmet humanitarian needs, and for cluster coordinators share relevant information and standards to attendees.[4] Clusters coordinators also coordinate fundraising for their respective humanitarian aid sector.[4] Between the 2005 launch and the 2010 assessment, the cluster coordination mechanism had raised US$57 million through the cluster system, representing less than 1% of total fundraising for the institutions during that period.[4]
Cluster coordination always occurs at a global level, national level, and local level and sometimes happens regionally or provincially depending on the specific circumstances of the emergency.[4]
First use
The cluster system was first used in response to the 2005 Kashmir earthquake.[1]
Critique
Advantages of the cluster system
A 2010 independent assessment of the cluster system found that the use of the cluster system has improved the humanitarian response to gender-based violence, inclusion of people with disabilities, child protection, nutrition, water and sanitation in some countries.[4] Use of the cluster system improved the participating organizations' ability to identify gaps in humanitarian needs, and avoid duplication of efforts.[4] Use of the cluster system increased the rate of learning between organizations, and improved the coordination of efforts due to an increase in the predictability of each others' actions.[4] The amount of collaboration between United Nations and non-UN organizations improved as a result of the use of the cluster system.[4]
Criticisms of the cluster system
Despite localisation aspirations, the cluster system centers around international humanitarian agencies, and excludes local and national organizations from coordination activities.[4] Use of the cluster system challenges the humanitarian principle of independence requiring humanitarian organizations to operate with independence from governments.[4] Poor coordination of clusters prevents activities from reaching their maximum potential, and many of the coordinators working in clusters lack the necessary skills.[4] Coordination between clusters is absent or weak, resulting in the compromised responses to issues that are relevant to more than one cluster.[4]
References
- "What is the Cluster Approach? | HumanitarianResponse". www.humanitarianresponse.info. Retrieved 2022-01-07.
- "UN IASC Cluster Approach". Disaster Philanthropy. 2020. Retrieved 2022-01-07.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - Stoddard, Abby; Harmer, Adele; Haver, Katherine; Salomons, Dirk; Wheeler, Victoria (November 2007). "Cluster Approach Evaluation" (PDF). ALNAP.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - Steets, Julia; Binder, Andrew; Krüger, Susanna; Meier, Claudia; Grünewald, François; de Geoffroy, Véronique; Kauffmann, Domitille; Sokpoh, B. (1 April 2010). "Cluster Approach Evaluation II Synthesis Report". www.gppi.net. Retrieved 2022-01-07.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link)