Pro-aging trance
Pro-aging trance, also known as pro-aging edifice,[1] is a term coined by British author and biomedical gerontologist Aubrey de Grey to describe the broadly positive and fatalistic attitude toward aging in society.
Overview
According to de Grey, the pro-aging trance is the most reasonable explanation for the phenomenon that many people gloss over aging through irrational thought patterns. It basically says that the thought of one's own body slowly but ceaselessly deteriorating is so burdensome that it seems most sensible from a psychological point of view to try to put it out of one's mind until there is a realistic chance of being able to seriously do something about it.[2][3] Since aging has been present since the dawn of civilization, this coping mechanism would be deeply rooted in human thinking.[4] It is striking that, in defending their point of view, those affected often commit fallacies which, from experience, would not be expected of them in a different context.[5]
Pro-aging consists both in the belief that the aging process is almost inevitable and will not be prevented by future developments, and in the view that any success in the fight against aging would have mainly negative consequences. Examples cited include boredom, unresolved problems regarding current pension systems, and dictators living forever,[6] but there is no juxtaposition or weighing of these potential disadvantages with the benefits of eliminating aging (such as saving about 100,000 lives per day).[7]
This behaviour is sometimes compared to the Stockholm syndrome: Just as hostages sympathize with their captors after a certain period of time, people come to terms with the idea that they will age and eventually die.[8]
De Grey assumes that robust mouse rejuvenation will provide a paradigm shift in society in this regard.[9]
The social psychologist Tom Pyszczynski, one of the founding psychologists of terror management theory, explains the opposition against life-prolonging therapies with exactly this model. According to him, the cause of that opposition is paradoxically that the critics fear death and actually long for radical life extension. However, since they do not consider it feasible or likely in their remaining lifetime, they try to deal with the terror caused by their own mortality through investing in a cultural worldview in the hope of achieving literal or symbolic immortality. The actual possibility of life extension challenges the beliefs and values that serve them as their protector from death-related thoughts. It thus generates the need to defend them and object to treatments that would actually extend lifespan. This goes hand in hand with the mortality salience hypothesis.[10]
According to representatives of the anti-aging movement, learned helplessness could also play a role in why many people resign themselves to aging.[11] In 1967, the psychologist and behavioral scientist Martin Seligman showed that dogs that are exposed to mild electric shocks and realize that they cannot do anything about it tend to continue to endure the shocks after this phase, even if they have the opportunity to avoid them. The attitude of many people toward their own aging process is similar: They have learned that any attempt to fight against it is in vain and will therefore disregard new possibilities.[11]
Issues
The pro-aging attitude is a hurdle in the rapid development of anti-aging medicine because it takes time for people to break out of it and the result of lacking public support is low research funding.[12][13]
Furthermore, aging is not socially perceived as a disease to be fought,[9][13] which is why it is more difficult to get support for fighting it than for fighting cancer, Alzheimer's disease, or similar diseases. De Grey sees the reason for this in the rhetoric of many gerontologists during the 1950s, -60s, and -70s, who usually drew a line in public communication between age-related diseases and "aging itself", even though the former were merely late stages of aging and therefore should not be viewed independently of the aging process.[14] Moreover, he argues that a post-aging world is portrayed predominantly dystopian in fiction, hence reinforcing people in their assumption that defeating aging is undesirable.[15]
Literature
- de Grey, Aubrey (2006). "Strategie per un invecchiamento transcurabile ingegnerizzato (Modest and dramatic human life extension: the how and the why; in English, translated from Italian by Bruna Tortorella)". In Donghi P (ed.). Alterando il destino dell’umanità (PDF). Rome: Laterza & Figli. pp. 49–63. ISBN 8842080489.
- de Grey, Aubrey (June 2006). "The Urgency Dilemma: Is Life Extension Research a Temptation or a Test?" (PDF). Update. Loma Linda University Center for Christian Bioethics. 21 (1): 6–10.
- de Grey, Aubrey; Michael, Rae (September 2007). Ending Aging: The Rejuvenation Breakthroughs that Could Reverse Human Aging in Our Lifetime. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press. p. 416. ISBN 0312367066.
- de Grey, Aubrey (April 2007). "The Natural Biogerontology Portfolio: "Defeating Aging" as a Multi-stage Ultra-grand Challenge" (PDF). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1100: 409–423. doi:10.1196/annals.1395.046. PMID 17460206.
- de Grey, Aubrey (November 2007). "Calorie Restriction, Post-reproductive Life Span, and Programmed Aging: A Plea for Rigor" (PDF). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1119: 296–305. doi:10.1196/annals.1404.029. PMID 17717100.
- de Grey, Aubrey (December 2007). "The Need to Debalkanize Gerontology: A Case Study" (PDF). Rejuvenation Research. 10 (4): 431–434. doi:10.1089/rej.2007.0633. PMID 18158741.
- de Grey, Aubrey (December 3, 2007). "Old People Are People Too: Why It Is Our Duty to Fight Aging to the Death". Cato Unbound. 12.
- de Grey, Aubrey (2007). "Life Span Extension Research and Public Debate: Societal Considerations" (PDF). Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology. 1 (1): Article 5. doi:10.2202/1941-6008.1011.
- de Grey, Aubrey (August 2008). "Combating the Tithonus Error: What Works?". Rejuvenation Research. 11 (4): 713–715. doi:10.1089/rej.2008.0775. PMID 18729803.
- de Grey, Aubrey (October 2008). "Trans-Simianism and Truthiness: Hints of Progress in the Debate on Whether Aging Is Good". Rejuvenation Research. 11 (5): 857–859. doi:10.1089/rej.2008.0805. PMID 18928423.
- de Grey, Aubrey (February 2009). "Cracks in Social Gerontology's Pro-Aging Edifice". Rejuvenation Research. 12 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1089/rej.2009.0841. PMID 19236163.
- Freitas, Robert A. Jr. (2007). "Medical Nanorobotics: Breaking the Trance of Futility in Life Extension Research (A Reply to de Grey)". Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology. 1 (1): Article 6. doi:10.2202/1941-6008.1022.
- Garreau, Joel (December 19, 2007). "Can aging be cured?". The Journal Times. Retrieved April 4, 2009.
- Häyry, Matti (2007). "Generous Funding for Interventive Aging Research Now?". Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology. 1 (1): Article 13. doi:10.2202/1941-6008.1017.
- Klein, Julia M. (January 25, 2008). "Forever Young". Obit Magazine. Retrieved April 4, 2009.
- Miller, Paul; & Wilsdon, James (February 3, 2006). "The man who wants to live forever". OpenDemocracy.net. Retrieved April 4, 2009.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Wolbring, Gregor (2007). "Should We 'Cure' Aging? A Reply to de Grey". Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology. 1 (1): Article 7. doi:10.2202/1941-6008.1020.
References
- de Grey, Aubrey (February 2009). "Cracks in Social Gerontology's Pro-Aging Edifice". Rejuvenation Research. 12 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1089/rej.2009.0841. PMID 19236163.
- Love, Dylan (2018-09-19). "Aubrey de Grey is working to cure aging whether you like it or not". TNW | Contributors. Retrieved 2021-10-26.
- Corbyn, Zoë (2015-01-11). "Live forever: Scientists say they'll extend life 'well beyond 120'". The Guardian. Retrieved 2021-10-28.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - "America: It's Time to Snap Out of the Pro-Death Trance". TechNewsWorld. 2011-07-20. Retrieved 2022-01-04.
- Bagalà, Nicola (2018-10-26). "Emerging From the Trance | Lifespan.io". www.lifespan.io. Retrieved 2021-10-25.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - Aubrey, de Grey. "A roadmap to end aging". TEDGlobal 2005.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - de Grey, Aubrey. "Biotechnology will solve the challenges of an aging population". The Guardian. Retrieved 2022-01-04.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - CGP Grey, Why Die?, retrieved 2022-03-14
- "Aubrey de Grey on Progress and Timescales in Rejuvenation Research". Fight Aging!. 2018-02-01. Retrieved 2021-10-25.
- Understanding the opposition to long-term extension of the human lifespan - Thomas Pyszczynski, retrieved 2022-02-06
- "Learned Helplessness and the Acceptance of Aging | Lifespan.io". www.lifespan.io. Retrieved 2022-03-13.
- Wray, Britt. "The ambitious quest to cure ageing like a disease". www.bbc.com. Retrieved 2021-10-27.
- Peikoff, Kira (2018-01-31). "Anti-Aging Pioneer Aubrey de Grey: "People in Middle Age Now Have a Fair Chance"". leaps.org. Retrieved 2021-10-25.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - de Grey, Aubrey; Rae, Michael (2007). Ending Aging: The Rejuvenation Breakthroughs that Could Reverse Human Aging in Our Lifetime. New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0-312-36706-0. OCLC 132583222.
- THNK Creative Leadership Forum Guest: Aubrey de Grey - pro aging trance, retrieved 2022-03-11