A Gest of Robyn Hode

A Gest of Robyn Hode (also known as A Lyttell Geste of Robyn Hode, and hereafter referred to as Gest) is one of the earliest surviving texts of the Robin Hood tales. Gest (which meant tale or adventure) is a compilation of various Robin Hood tales, arranged as a sequence of adventures involving the yeoman outlaws Robin Hood and Little John, the poor knight Sir Richard at the Lee, the greedy abbot of St Mary's Abbey, the villainous Sheriff of Nottingham, and King Edward of England. The work survives only in printed editions from the early 16th century; just some 30 years after the first printing press was brought to England. Its popularity can be estimated from the fact that portions of more than ten 16th and 17th century printed editions have been preserved. Written in late Middle English poetic verse, Gest is an early example of an English language ballad, in which the verses are grouped in quatrains with an abcb rhyme scheme.

Illustrated first page from ca 16th-century print edition. Now housed at the Library of Scotland.

As a literary work, Gest was first studied in detail by William Hall Clawson in 1909.[1] Research did not resume until 1968, when the medievalist D C Fowler published A Literary History of the Popular Ballad.[2] Since then, study of Gest has been sporadic. In 1989, two historians, R B Dobson and John Taylor, wrote "Rymes of Robyn Hood"[3] as a source book and complete introduction to the subject. In 1997, Stephen Knight and Thomas H Ohlgren published Robin Hood and Other Outlaw Tales,[4] a collection of all the pre-17th century tales of Robin Hood, arranged in chronological order. Their book now forms the core of the Robin Hood Project of the University of Rochester's Middle English Texts website.[5] In 2013 Ohlgren and linguist Lister M Matheson published Early Rymes of Robin Hood,[6] which includes "as-is" transcriptions of all the earliest surviving copies of Gest for use by scholars.

Summary

Gest contains four tales which are broken up into episodes, which then interleave among the eight fyttes (sections) of the poem. However, the beginning/end of a tale or episode does not always align with the beginning/end of a fytte. For a modern reader, this makes Gest difficult to follow. This summary follows the outline proposed by J B Bessinger Jr[7]:47-8, which follows the order of the fyttes. Bessinger's outline contains four arbitrary names for the tales, which are based upon the main characters:

  1. Robin Hood, Knight, and Abbot (herein called Tale A)
  2. Robin Hood, Little John, Sheriff, and Knight (herein called Tale B)
  3. Robin Hood, Knight, and King (herein called Tale C)
  4. Death of Robin Hood (herein called Tale D)

Each tale is told in 1, 2 or 3 episodes. Quotes from the text have been given with modern spelling.

Episode 1 (First Fytte)[8]:lines 1-324

Engraving from 1887 edition of Ritson's Robin Hood.

Robin Hood, a good yeoman and courteous outlaw, has heard 3 masses this morning: one to honor God the Father; one to honor the Holy Ghost; and one to honor the Virgin Mary, for whom he has a deep devotion. He has fasted since midnight, and Little John, also a good yeoman, suggests he should eat soon. But Robin declines to dine without an "uncouth guest"[8]:line 24 to pay for the feast. Someone such as a baron, knight or squire; but only if they not are "good fellows"[8]:line 56. Neither are farmers or other yeomen to be accosted. However, bishops and archbishops are to tied up, beaten, and robbed. The High Sheriff of Nottingham is a special target. Little John, Much the Miller's son and a good man, and good William Scarlock leave to search for a guest.

They see a knight on horseback in a back street in Barnsdale. He looks forlorn, slouched over in his saddle, his face careworn and streaked with tears. Little John approaches the Sorrowful Knight, genuflects, and welcomes him to the forest, saying his Master Robin Hood is waiting dinner for him. The Knight remarks "He is good yeoman ... /Of him I have heard much good."[8]:lines 103-104 The Knight leaves with the outlaws.

Robin Hood, Little John and the Knight in the huntsman's hut. Engraving from 1887 edition of Ritson's Robin Hood.

When Robin Hood sees the Sorrowful Knight, he pushes back his hood, and genuflects to him. They all wash up, and sit down to a fine feast. They enjoy plenty of bread and wine, along with deer sweatbreads, pheasants, swans, and other river birds. The Knight remarks that he had not had such a dinner for weeks, and should he pass through this way again, he would return the favor. Robin retorts that the Knight should pay before he leaves, as it is not proper for a yeoman to pay for a knight's feast. The Sorrowful Knight says he has only 10 shillings, and is embarrassed to offer such a small amount. Little John checks his baggage, and verifies the Sorrowful Knight is truthful.

Robin remarks on the Sorrowful Knight's threadbare clothing, and inquires about his situation. the Sorrowful Knight responds that his ancestors have been knights for 100 years but now he is disgraced, because his son and heir killed a knight of Lancaster. To redeem him, the Sorrowful Knight borrowed 400 pounds from the Rich Abbot of St Mary's, using his lands as collateral. The loan is now due, but he has only 10 shillings, so his lands will be seized by the Abbot. Robin asks if he had any friends. The Knight replies that he had plenty when he was rich, but none that he is poor. Robin then asks if he has anybody who could offer collateral. The Knight replied that he had none "But if it be Our dear Lady;/She failed me never or this day."[8]:lines 259-60 Robin, who has a deep devotion to the Virgin Mary, declares that she is the best collateral in all of England. He instructs Little John to fetch 400 pounds from their treasure chest, and pay the Knight. Emboldened by Robin's words, Little John suggests new livery in Robin's colors of scarlet and green, and a new horse. Robin offers a gray courser with a new saddle; after all, he says, the Knight is the Virgin Mary's messenger. Much suggests a good palfrey, Scarlock suggests new boots, and Little John suggests shining spurs. Robin adds that a knight can not ride alone, and offers Little John as a companion. "In a yeoman's stead he may thee stand,/If thou great need have."[8]:lines 323-24

Episode 2 (Second Fytte)[8]:lines 325-572

The Gate Lodge at St Mary's Abbey, York

The scene switches to York, where the monks of St Mary's Abbey are sitting down to dinner. The Abbot, the Prior, the Chief Steward, the Sheriff of Yorkshire, and the county Justice are discussing the Knight whose debt of 400 pounds is due today. The Prior observes that if it was him, he would pay 100 pounds now and the rest later. The Abbot remarks that the Knight is suffering hunger and cold while serving England's cause overseas. The Prior admonishes the Abbot that, in that case, it would pitiful to take his land; but such a grevious wrong would not bother the Abbot's conscience at all. The Abbot snaps back at the Prior, telling him he's always getting in the way. The "fat-headed"[line 363] Chief Steward suggests that the Knight is either dead or hanged. The county Justice offers his opinion that the Knight will not come. They are all disappointed when the Knight appears at the gate.

The Knight genuflects and salutes them all "great and small"[8]:line 408. Upset at the Knight's appearance in the Abbey hall, the Abbot skips the customary courtesies and demands if he brought the Abbot's money. Not one penny, the Knight calmly replies. The Abbot snaps back, then why are you here? The Knight answers that he is here to beg for more time. The county Justice sharply interrupts, your time is up and your land is forfeit. Still on one knee, the Knight begs the Justice to "be my frende"[8]:line 423. The Justice responds that he can not; he is working on retainer from the Abbot. The Knight then looks to the Sheriff, who also refuses to aid the Knight. Finally the Knight offers his services as the Abbot's Knight until the debt is paid. The Abbot rebukes the Knight's offer. "'Out,' he said, 'thou false knight,/Speed thee out of my hall!'"[8]:lines 451-2 The Knight calls the Abbot a liar, and stands up.

The Knight approaches the Abbot to pay his debt. Engraving from 1884 edition of Ritson's Robin Hood.

As the Knight approaches, the Justice asks the Abbot how much would he give the Knight to purchase the land outright. 100 pounds is the Abbot's reply; make it 200, insists the Justice. The Knight strides to the Abbot's table, and shakes Robin's 400 pounds out of the bag and onto the table. The Abbot is stunned. He tells the Justice to take the money as an additional retainer. The Justice refuses. The Knight then announces to everyone in the hall that he has paid his debt; his land is his once more. The Knight leaves, now carefree. He travels home with a light heart, singing. His worried wife meets him at the gate to Wyresdale. Be happy, my wife, says the Knight, and pray for Robin Hood; without his kindness, we would be beggars now.

Over the next year the Knight accumulates the 400 pounds to repay Robin Hood. He also purchases 100 bows, 100 bundles of arrows, 100 horses, and hires 100 men clothed in red and white clothing. On the day his debt is due, the Knight and his men head for Barnesdale. At Wentbridge, they pass a fair where a stranger has won the wrestling match. The yeoman is in danger of being killed by the crowd. Remembering how Robin treated him, he orders his company to surround the yeoman, shouting that no harm would befall him. He purchases a cask of wine and breaks it open so that all may drink. But the Knight and his company stay until the fair is done to ensure the yeoman's safety. In the meantime, Robin Hood is waiting under the tree in the greenwood.

Episode 1 (Third Fytte)[8]:lines 573-816

It is now autumn.[8]:line 704 Little John is still the Knight's Yeoman, and joins other young men in longbow target practice. Three times Little John shoots; three times he "split the wand"[8]:line 582. The Sheriff of Nottingham is impressed. He approaches Little John, asking his name and birthplace. Little John replies, Reynold Greenleaf of Holderness. The Sheriff then asks Little John to work for him. Only if the Sheriff obtains a leave of absence from the Knight, Little John advises. The Knight agrees, and Little John rides off on one of the Sheriff's good strong horses.

Little John beats up the Butler. Engraving from 1884 edition of Ritson's Robin Hood.

One day the Sheriff goes hunting and leaves Little John behind. It is now past noon, and Little John has not eaten. Little John asks the steward for dinner, but is told not until the Sheriff comes home. Little John then threatens the butler, and gives him a strong blow to his back. The butler runs to the pantry and shuts the door. Little John kicks the door open and drinks more than his share of the ale and wine.

The Sheriff's Cook, a bold stout man, confronts Little John. The Cook delivers three strong blows to Little John, who vows that he won't leave until he pays the Cook back. They both draw swords and fight for an hour, with neither gaining the advantage. Little John acknowledges that the Cook is the best swordsman he has ever seen; if he is as good with the bow, the Cook could join with Robin Hood. The Cook agrees. Little John and the Cook sit down to a fine dinner. Then they break the lock on the Sheriff's treasury and steal all the silver dinnerware plus 300 pounds in coin. They leave immediately to meet Robin Hood.

After they greet each other, Robin Hood inquires as who is "that fair yeoman"[8]:line 709 accompanying Little John, and what is the news from Nottingham. Little John responds that the proud Sheriff sends his greetings, his Cook, his silver tableware, and 300 pounds in coin. Robin replies sarcastically that it wasn't because of the Sheriff's generosity. Little John has a sudden thought to trick the Sheriff. He runs 5 miles to meet the Sheriff, hunting with his hounds. Where have you been, demands the Sheriff. In this forest, replies Little John, I have seen a green hart, with a herd of 140 deer. The Sherriff exclaims, that would be a sight to see! Then quickly follow me, says Little John. When they meet Robin and his 140 men, Little John announces that here is the master hart and his herd of deer! The Sheriff is amazed by how Little John has betrayed him. It's your fault, says Little John, I never got my dinner at your place.

The Sheriff sits down to dinner, and is horrified when he realizes he is eating from his own silver tableware. Robin says, consider it charity, and for Little John's sake, I grant you your life. When dinner was done, Robin tells Little John to strip the Sheriff of his fur-lined mantle and all his fine clothes, and wrap him in a green mantle. Robin then orders the Sheriff's men to do likewise, and lie down next to the Sheriff. All night they lie on the cold ground in only their breeches, shirts, and the green mantles. The next morning, the Sheriff complains about his stiff muscles. Don't complain, replies Robin, this is how we live; he continues, for the next year, I will teach you how to live as an outlaw. The Sheriff grumbles, not for all the gold in England. He pleads with Robin to let him go. Robin demands that he swear an oath on Robin's sword that he will never again harm Robin or any of his men. The Sheriff swears his oath, and leaves the greenwood.

Episode 3a (Fourth Fytte)[8]:lines 817-1040

It is now one year later. The scene is Robin Hood and Little John in the greenwood. Little John suggests that it is time for dinner, but Robin declines. He fears the Virgin Mary is angry with him, since the Knight has not yet arrived. Little John consoles him, saying that the sun has not yet set, and the Knight is true to his word. Robin instructs Little John to take Much and William Scarlok, and search for an "unknown guest"[line ??]. Irritated, Little John takes up his bow and his sword to do Robin's bidding.

The Monk of St Mary's in Barnesdale Forest. Engraving from 1884 edition of Ritson's Robin Hood.

On the highway in Barnesdale they spot a monk on a good palfrey. Little John remarks to Much, here is our pay. The monk is being escorted by 52 men and seven pack horses. Little John tells his companions to prepare for an ambush. He aims his arrow at the monk, ordering him to stop where he is. Calling him a churlish monk, Little John accuses the Monk of angering his master, Robin Hood. ""He is a strong thief," said the monk,/"Of him heard I never good.""[8]:lines 883-4. Much lets fly an arrow which barely misses the Monk's chest, and he quickly dismounts. All the attendants turn and flee, leaving only a little page and a groom with the pack horses.

Little John brings the Monk to the huntsman's hut. Robin Hood lowers his hood, but the uncourteous Monk does not. Robin asks Little John how many men the monk had. 52 men, is his answer. Blow the horn, orders Robin. 140 men, dressed in striped scarlet, answer the call to run down the Monk's attendants. Robin & Little John force the Monk to wash up for dinner, and they serve him at the table. While he is eating, Robin asks the Monk, to which abbey do you belong & what office do you hold. I am the Chief Steward of St Mary's Abbey, answers the Monk.

Robin Hood is still worried that the Virgin Mary is angry with him, since the Knight has not yet appeared. Little John tells Robin not to worry, the Monk has brought the money; he is from her abbey. Robin is not consoled. She was my collateral for a loan I made to the Knight, he says. Speaking to the Monk, Robin asks to see the silver - if he brought it. The Monk swears at Robin, saying he knows nothing of this loan. Robin Hood retorts: God is righteous, and so is the Virgin Mary, you are to blame; you are her servant, and her messenger. How much money do you carry, Robin Hood demands of the Monk. 20 marks of silver, he replies. Robin orders Little John to check the Monk's baggage.

After laying out the contents of the Monk's purse, Little John hurries back to Robin Hood. The Virgin Mary has doubled your money, he declares. Robin is elated. They all drink to her honor. Curious at what is in the packhorses, Robin again asks Little John to search again. The Monk protests strenuously, mounts his horse, and rides off.

Episode 3b (Fourth Fytte)[8]:lines 1041-1120

The Poor Knight meets Robin Hood. Engraving from 1884 edition of Ritson's Robin Hood.

It is still daylight when the Knight rides into Barnesdale, and sees Robin Hood standing under the greenwood tree. The Knight dismounts, lowers his hood, and genuflects to Robin. Robin warmly welcomes him, and asks why he is so late. The Knight replies that he stopped to help a poor yeoman in trouble. In that case, rejoins Robin, for helping a good yeoman, I am your friend. The Knight offers the 400 pounds, and 20 marks more for Robin's courtesy. He refuses, saying the money was already delivered by the Monk of St Mary's. But the bows and arrows I brought are a poor payment, says the Knight. Robin sends Little John to retrieve 400 pounds of the Monk's money, and then hands it to the Knight. Buy a horse and a good harness, he says, get some new clothing. And he adds, if ever you need spending money, come see me.

Episode 2 (Fifth Fytte)[8]:lines 1121-1264

Much carries a wounded Little John away from Nottingham. Engraving from 1884 edition of Ritson's Robin Hood.

The Sheriff of Nottingham announces an archery contest for all the best archers of the North. The prize will be an arrow with a head and feathers of red gold, and a shaft of white silver. Upon hearing of the contest, Robin Hood calls his fellowship together. He orders that only six of his men shoot with him; the rest, with arrows nocked, are to keep watch on the Sheriff's men.

Three times Robin shoots, and three times he splits the wand. But so did good Gilberte with the White Hand. The two shoot again, but Robin is best, and wins the prize. The outlaws begin their return to the greenwood, but the fair-goers shout and blow horns. The Sheriff's men loose a hail of arrows, and Robin shouts curses at the Sheriff for breaking his pledge. Many of the fellowship are wounded, including Little John, who took an arrow to his knee. Little John begs Robin not to let the Sheriff take him alive - he tells Robin to inflict mortal wounds to his head. Robin replies, not for all the gold in England! God forbid that you should die, cries Much, and hefts Little John onto his back.

Not far away is the castle of Sir Richard at the Lee, the Sorrowful Knight. Immediately Sir Richard takes in Robin and his men. He orders the gates be shut, the bridge be drawn up, and the walls manned.

Episode 3 (Sixth Fytte)[8]:lines 1265-1412

Sir Richard defends his castle against the Sheriff of Nottingham. Engraving from 1884 edition of Ritson's Robin Hood.

The High Sheriff of Nottingham raises a large army from around the countryside to besiege Sir Richard's castle. Traitorous Knight, the proud Sheriff shouts to Sir Richard, you harbor the King's enemy against the law. The Knight courteously agrees that he is doing so. Sir Richard adds, tell our King what has happened, and see what he says.

Robin Hood and the Knight's Lady. Engraving from 1887 edition of Ritson's Robin Hood.

The Sheriff rides to London, and tells the King that Sir Richard is supporting the outlaw band. Furthermore, he tells the King, Sir Richard is using the outlaws to set himself up as lord of the north land. The King said he would be in Nottingham in two weeks, and that the Sheriff is to gather more archers from all over the countryside. In the meantime, Robin Hood returns to the greenwood, where Little John later joins him after his knee heals.

Having missed his chance to capture Robin, the Sheriff lies in wait to capture Sir Richard instead. He finally overcomes the gentle Knight as he is hawking by the river, and takes him to Nottingham. When Sir Richard's wife is told what has happened, she rides out to the greenwood to find Robin. For Our dear Lady's sake, she implores Robin, don't let my husband be killed for supporting you. Who took your lord, asks Robin. The Sheriff, she replies, and they are not more than three miles from here. Robin quickly gathers his men and they run towards Nottingham.

The fellowship catches up with the Sheriff. Robin stops the Sheriff, asking about the news from the King. Robin then quickly draws his bow, and lets loose an arrow that knocks the Sheriff off his horse. Before the Sheriff can rise, Robin beheads him with his sword. Lie there, proud Sheriff, taunts Robin, no man could trust you while you were alive.

The rest of the fellowship attack the Sheriff's men and cut them down. Robin leaps to Sir Richard's side, cuts his bonds, and hands him a bow. Come to the greenwood with me, Robin orders, until I can get us "... grace/Of Edward, our comely king."[8]:lines 1411-12

Episode 1 (Seventh Fytte)[8]:lines 1413-1668

The King arrives at Nottingham and asks about Robin Hood and Sir Richard. Hearing what has happened, he seizes the Knight's lands, and searches for Robin throughout Lancashire. Reaching Plompton Park, he notices that there are far fewer deer than usual. Cursing Robin Hood, the King orders Robin to be brought before him, and that anyone who brings him the head of Sir Richard would receive his lands. Then an old knight advises, as long as Robin Hood lives, no man will hold Sir Richard's lands. Six months later, one of the King's royal foresters approaches the King, suggesting a subterfuge to catch Robin. You and five men should dress as monks, he said, and I will lead you into the forest; then you will meet Robin Hood. The King wears a broad abbot's hat to conceal his face, and goes into the forest.

Robin Hood is felled by the disguised King. Engraving from 1884 edition of Ritson's Robin Hood.

They soon meet Robin, standing in the road along with many of his men. Robin Hood grabs the reins of the King's horse. Sir Abbot, Robin addresses the disguised King, we are but poor yeomen of the forest who live by the King's deer, share with us some of your wealth as an act of charity. The disguised King replies he has only 40 pounds, having spent much during the last two weeks entertaining the King and his lords. If I had 100 pounds, he continues, I would give you half. Robin takes the 40 pounds, counts out 20 pounds, and returns 20 pounds to the disguised King. Our great king bids you come to Nottingham, says the disguised King, and shows Robin the royal seal. Robin immediately genuflects as he says, "I love no man in all the world/ So well as I do my king;/ Welcome is my lord's seal;"[8]:lines 1541-43 In honor of the King, Robin invites the disguised King to dinner. Robin blows his horn to assemble the fellowship, who genuflect around him. The disguised King is surprised, realizing that Robin's men are more willing to answer his call than the royal men are to answer the King's call. Quickly the feast is prepared, with Robin and Little John waiting on the disguised King themselves. The disguised King is treated to fat venison, white bread, red wine, and ale.

After dinner, Robin arranges an archery demonstration. The disguised King remarks that the targets were too far away. Robin orders, anyone who misses the target would forfeit his arrows and endure a slap on his face from me. Twice Robin shoots, and twice he splits the wand. On the third attempt, Robin misses, and his men taunt him. Robin approaches the disguised King, offers his arrows, and says he is ready for his slap. The disguised King declines, saying it is against the rules of his order. Do it, declares Robin. The disguised King rolls up his sleeve and deals a resounding slap that knocks Robin to the ground. The disguised King bends over to help Robin up, and as he does so, Robin looks intently into the King's face. Noticing Robin's reaction, Sir Richard does the same. Then both of them genuflect to their King. Robin asks mercy for his men, which the King grants. The King then invites Robin to join Edward's royal court. Only if I can bring my men with me, replies Robin.

Episode 2 (Eighth Fytte)[8]:lines 1669-1800

Homesick Robin Hood at the King's court. Engraving from 1884 edition of Ritson's Robin Hood.
Engraving from 1887 edition of Ritson's Robin Hood.

The King asks if Robin has any green cloth so he and his men can exchange their black cowls for ones of Lincoln green. Back to Nottingham, the King commands. With feasting, drinking, and singing, the King welcomes Robin and his men into his service, and restores Sir Richard's lands.

Robin and his men spend the next year in the royal court. Robin has spent all his wealth, as well as the money meant for his men. Now only Little John and Scathelock remain. One day, while watching some young men at target practice, he becomes homesick. Robin asks the King for leave to make a pilgrimage to his chapel of Mary Magdalene in Barnsdale. The King grants him seven days.

When he reaches the greenwood with the birds merrily singing. He shoots a hart, and blows his horn. All the outlaws in the forest recognize Robin's horn and come running. They push back their hoods and genuflect, welcoming Robin back. There he remained for twenty-two years.

Eighth Fytte[8]:lines 1801-24

Robin has a kinswoman who was Prioress of Kirkley. But she and her lover, Sir Roger of Doncaster, are plotting to kill Robin. Since the Prioress is skilled in the art of blood-letting, she lets Robin slowly bleed to death when he comes to Kirkley for treatment. The tale ends with a prayer: "Christ have mercy on his soul,/.../For he was a good outlaw,/And did poor men much good."[8]:lines 1821, 1823-4

Geography

The place names mentioned in Gest firmly locate Robin Hood in the West Riding of Yorkshire: Blyth; Doncaster; St Mary Magdalene Church at Campsall; and Kirklees Abbey. The cities of York, Lancaster, and Nottingham, as well as the Knight's castle at Wyresdale, are also mentioned. This area is famous for its wide river valleys, and the eastern foothills of the South Pennines, with its numerous limestone caves where outlaws could hide. But the greenwood of Barnsdale Forest is really Robin's home. "Robyn stood in Barnesdale/And leaned him to a tree,"[8]:lines 9-10 is how the tale of the Sorrowful Knight opens.

Barnsdale Forest

Approximate locations of Royal Forests, ca AD 1327-36
Remnants of Barnsdale Forest
Barnsdale Wood
Hanging Wood
Ordinary forester grave slab ca 13th century; near Hope, Derbyshire

In medieval England, forest meant an area which is similar to a modern nature preserve, but more like the Yorkshire Dales than the Allegheny National Forest. It was considered waste londe (waste land) which was not capable of being farmed or put to any other purpose. The land thus remained in its natural state.[9]:Waste 1.c It harbored wild game animals, such as Red deer, Roe deer, Fallow deer, and wild boar, which became the favorite prey of the Saxon, Danish, Norman and Plantagenet kings of England. The hunt was as much a passion of the Norman kings as it was for the Saxon kings. Therefore, the Normans claimed, by right of conquest, the hunting rights of the Saxon and Danish kings. Wild animals were considered to be ownerless property, and therefore the property of the King. Thus, hunting wild animals became a right of the King.[10]:1-5 To protect their hunting rights, the Norman kings instituted the notorious Forest Laws to protect their favorite hunting grounds.[8]:Note 1429

No records of Barnsdale Forest are known to survive, but there are records of the royal forests surrounding the West Riding of Yorkshire. In late 1222, a furious North Sea gale devastated much of Eastern England. King Henry III issued orders to his forest officials not to remove anything and to submit value estimates of the trees and branches which were felled by the storm. The following January Henry sent orders to the county sheriffs to place the proceeds from the sale of the wind-fallen trees and branches in a religious house in their county. Among others, these orders were sent to those in charge of: Galtres and Pikering Forests (both in the North Riding of Yorkshire); Northumberland and Lancashire (both counties were considered as forests); Nottingham and Sherwood Forests.[10]:6-7 It is interesting to note that in this list the entire historic county of Lancashire - which lies west of the West Riding of Yorkshire - was considered a forest area. (After 1310, these forests were granted to the Duke of Lancaster.[10]:98) Also note that Nottingham Forest (just south of the West Riding) was considered separate from Sherwood Forest.

Royal forester grave slab ca 15th century; near Papplewick, Nottinghamshire

It is possible that Barnsdale Forest may have been the local name given to part of either the Lancashire Forest or the Nottingham Forest, or both. The Gest poet tells how King Edward traveled 'far and near' in Lancashire looking for Robin Hood[8]:lines 1425-26. The Gest poet also says that Robin's adversary was the high sheriff of Nottingham[8]:line 59. Between 1068 and 1566 the sheriff's full title was High Sheriff of Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and the Royal Forests.[Note 1] However, Knight and Ohlgren suggest that this confusion about the Sheriff of Nottingham operating in Yorkshire is due to the merger of different ballads by the Gest poet.[8]:Note 59

The head officer of the Royal Forest was variously called a warden, bailif or forester, who swore an oath to preserve the vert and venison[11]:Vert 1.b. The ordinary foresters cared for the newly dropped fawns and their mothers at midsummer; during winter, they provided deer-browse or tree-clippings. They were entitled to pasture their cattle within the forest, and were allowed to let their hogs forage for acorns during the autumn. On their grave slabs, ordinary foresters are identified by their symbol, a horn, which is sometimes shown attached to a balric. They were not permitted to carry bows, except on direct orders.[10]:19-20 The chief or royal forester served at the King's pleasure, and his main duty was presiding at the local courts. If the forest had a castle, he was also keeper of the castle. When the King visited, he ensured the animals the King wanted to hunt were herded to where the King wanted to hunt. The chief forester's symbol was the bow.[10]:20

In Gest, Robin and Little John are praised for their skill with the bow, and Robin gathers his fellowship together by blowing on his horn.

Earliest Texts

A Gest of Robin Hode is considered as one of the three oldest Robin Hood tales. The other two are Robin Hood and the Monk (Child 119) and Robin Hood and the Potter (Child 121). Both of these latter tales survive as manuscripts dated to the second half of the 15th century; however, there are no surviving manuscripts of Gest.[12] The earliest text fragments for Gest are from about a dozen printed editions dated to the 16th and 17th centuries.[6]:?? To identify the most important editions, Child labeled them as a through g. Texts a through e are referred to as the early texts, and texts f and g are called the later texts.[13] Of interest to linguists and historians is that the later texts replaced some of the obsolete words of the early texts in order to make Gest more understandable to the audiences of the time.[14]:40[13][14]:39 Since Child's time, more editions have been identified by researchers.

John Maddicott has remarked on the lack of variation between the two earliest texts: text a and text b. He interpreted this lack of variation to a standard work being available prior to the printed editions.[15]:233-4

text a

also known as the Antwerp edition
Entitled A Gest of Robyn Hode; it has no printer's name, location, or date.

Formerly known as the Lettersnijder edition, it is attributed to Jan van Doesbroch in Antwerp ca 1510. Although it contains only about 200 of the total 456 quatrains, it is considered the most authentic version of the text, due to the linguistic archaisms in the text.[13] It is housed at the National Library of Scotland.

Text a is part of an eleven-text volume known as the Chapman and Myllar prints.[16] However, only nine texts in the volume were actually printed by Chapman and Myllar. Text a was one of the two texts which were not. According to the National Library of Scotland, the volume was presented to the Advocates Library sometime before August 1788 by John Alston of Glasgow. The binding was not sturdy, being made of parchment, which explains why so many pages of text a are lost. (Text a being the last work in the volume.) Sometime between 1798 and 1808 the volume was rebound in London by Charles Hering.[17]

The page illustration shown at the top of this article shows the first page of text a.[18] The woodcut is almost identical to the Yeoman woodcut in Richard Pynson's edition of The Canterbury Tales. However, the typesetter did not leave enough room for the woodcut, and had to reset the first 1-1/2 pages. The typesetter resorted to using abbreviations and run-on sentences to make everything fit.[6]:57

text b

Wynkyn de Worde printer device (before ca 1520)
also known as the de Worde edition, ca 1493-1518
Entitled A Lytell Geste of Robyn Hode; it was printed by Wynken de Worde in London.

This edition is nearly complete, and may be older than text a. It was used as the base text by Ritson and Gutch. Modern scholars, such as Child, Dobson and Taylor, Knight, and Ohlgren consider it to contain more errors, so they use text a and filled in from text b.[13] It is housed at Cambridge University Library.

The edition's date is determined from the type fonts used, and the printer's device on the last page.[6]:89

texts c through e (Douce Fragments)

Individual pages which are in poor condition. They are housed at the Bodleian Library.

text f (Copeland edition)

Entitled A Mery Geste of Robyn Hoode. it was printed in London by William Copeland no earlier than 1548. It is housed at the British Museum.

text g (White edition)

Entitled A Merry Gest of Robin Hood. it was printed in London for Edward White, and is undated. It is housed at the Bodleian Library.

Pynson's edition (ca 1495-1500)

Entitled A Lytell Geste. This edition survives as 3 sets of fragments:[6]:45

  • text c (Douce Fragment)
  • single leaf fragment, now housed at Cambridge University Library
  • two leaves now housed at the Folger Shakespeare Library

Hugo Goes edition

Entitled A Lytell Geste and printed in York sometime prior to 1509. The only surviving leaf is one of the Douce Fragments (e.12). Hugo Goes worked with one of de Worde's assistants, Henry Watson. When de Worde moved his business to Fleet Street after 1500, Goes acquired some of his fonts before moving to York to start his own business.[6]:157-8

Julian Notary edition (ca 1515)

Entitled A Lytell Geste. The surviving fragments are four imperfect leaves attached to paper binding strips (Douce fragment f.1). The attribution to Notary is confirmed by the size and style of the type fonts; he was the only London printer to use 92 mm.[6]:149-50

Copeland edition (ca 1565)

A single leaf fragment of waste print used as spine support for a volume printed in London by John Wolfe in 1584.

It is attributed to Copeland based upon the type font. The date is estimated from the language differences from his 1560 edition.[6]:239-40 It is housed at the Codrington Library, All Souls College, Oxford.

White edition (copy of the Bodleian Library edition)

Entitled A Merry Iest of Robin Hood, and printed in London for Edward White, bookseller, ca 1594. The printer is thought to have been Edward Allde. Anthony Munday, author of the Robin Hood plays, was apprenticed to Allde. The text is closely based upon William Copeland's edition, however, the spelling was updated and punctuation was introduced.[6]:245-7 It is housed at the Chaplin Library, Williams College, Williamstown MA.

Literary Analysis

An iconic pose of Robin Hood, as illustrated by Louis Rhead.

As a literary work, Gest was first studied in detail by William Hall Clawson in 1909.[1] Clawson was a student of F J Child's successor, George Lyman Kittredge, and his dissertation on Gest expanded on Child's introduction.[v 3, p ?] Research did not resume until 1968, when the medievalist D C Fowler published A Literary History of the Popular Ballad.[2] Fowler was one of the first to advocate the study of the English and Scottish ballads relative to their historical time and place, rather than simply within the classification of the Child anthology.[2]:3,4 In 1974, J B Bessinger Jr attempted to extend Clawson(p 40) and incorporate Fowler's proposal that Gest was a product of 15th century minstrels.[2]:43 One of Bessinger's important contributions was a narrative schematic that refined Child's "3-ply web"[Child,V,p ?] into 3 tales of 9 episodes distributed among 8 fyttes.[7]:47-8

In 1984, Douglas Gray, the first J. R. R. Tolkien Professor of English Literature and Language at the University of Oxford, was the first to consider the Robin Hood and Scottish Border ballads as oral poems. He objected to the then-current definitions of a ballad as some ideal form, whose characteristics were distilled from the Child Ballads.[Note 2] When compared to "this notion of a 'pure ballad', the Robin Hood poems seem messy and anormalous", he contended.[19]:9 Therefore, he titled his article The Robin Hood Poems,[19] and not The Robin Hood Ballads.

However, Gray admitted that the Robin Hood tales, like most popular literature, are sometimes regarded as "sub-literary material", containing formulaic language and a "thin texture", especially "when they are read on the printed page".[19]:4 Additionally, he argued, that since Child had grouped all the Robin Hood 'ballads' together, some literary studies had "rashly based themselves on all the Robin Hood ballads in the collection"[19]:9, instead of discarding those of dubious value. J R Maddicott also recognized this issue, and argued that since so little is known about the origins of the ballads from the available early manuscripts and printed texts, internal evidence has to be used.[15]:233) Gray further contended that, as oral poetry, each poem should be judged as a performance. He agreed with Ruth Finnegan in considering the performance as "integral to the identity of the poem as actually realized".[19]:10 In an oral performance, a skillful raconteur can draw his audience in, making them part of his performance; hence no two oral performances are identical.[19]:10 Gray points out that one of the characteristics of Gest are scenes with rapid dialogue or conversations, in which the formulaic diction, limited vocabulary, and stereotyped expressions are artfully used to express emotion.[19]:25 Such scenes lying dully on a page can spring into action when recited by one or two talented minstrels.

The Gest poet

Gest is a compilation of many early Robin Hood tales, either in verse or prose, but most of them now lost.[20]:25[21]:431[12]:?? They were woven together into a single narrative poem by an unknown poet, herein called the 'Gest poet'.

Linguistic analysis

Francis James Child was the first to look at Gest from a linguistic perspective. While compiling The English and Scottish Popular Ballads, he was in frequent contact with language scholars in England who were collecting quotations from Middle English texts for what would become the first volumes of the Oxford English Dictionary. These scholars, including Walter William Skeat, the leading philologist in England, would later publish A Concise Dictionary of Middle English,[22] and An Etymological Dictionary of the English Language.[23] It was Skeat who provided Child with transcriptions of the texts that appeared in Child's anthology. Skeat also was one of the first philologists to discuss English language dialects in English dialects from the eighth century to the present day published in 1911.[24]

In his introduction to Gest, Child tried to argue that the references to Robin Hood in Piers Plowman and the Scottish chronicles indicated a date of composition for Gest as early as 1400, or even earlier. However, he was forced to conclude that "There are no firm grounds on which to base an opinion."[14]:40 Child asserted that there were "A considerable number of Middle-English forms" present; he even constructed a partial listing of the words ending in '-e'. William Hall Clawson,[25] a doctoral student under Child's successor, George Lyman Kittredge, expanded Child's word list, and even calculated the final totals of how many times such words were used in each Fytte. Thus Clawson attempted to "prove clearly that it [Gest] extends back to a period ... antedating the year 1400."[1]:4-6

It wasn't until 1985 that a modern linguistic analysis of Gest was performed by Masa Ikegami.[26] He constructed multiple lines of linguistic evidence that Gest was written in a Northern or East Midlands dialect, most probably during the mid- to late-15th century. His evidence is based upon Gest's quatrain structure, its abcb or abab rhyme scheme, and its meter (rhythm pattern). The Gest meter can be summarized as:

  • the first and third lines have four metrically stressed syllables
  • the second and fourth lines have three metrically stressed syllables
  • each stressed syllable is preceded by one or two unstressed syllables

This meter is illustrated in the following quatrain, which should be read aloud in order to hear the rhythm of the stressed syllables (in bold font):

Where we shall take, where we shall leave,
Where we shall a-bide be-hind;
Where we shall rob, where we shall reive,
Where we shall beat and bind.


Gest of Robyn Hood,[8] lines 45-48 (modern spelling)

Irregular lines do occur, but they are limited, and only occur in the 3-beat lines.[26]:272-3

Presence of silent final '-e'

Modern linguists no longer accept the presence of final '-e' (now known as schwa) as evidence for composition prior to 1400. Ikegami provides a summary of other works known to have been composed in the 15th which contain the silent final '-e'.[26]:271

The silent final '-e' does not have to be pronounced in Gest in order to support the meter (rhythm pattern). Ikegami uses the example of 'grene wode', which Modern English speakers pronounce as two syllables: 'green wood'. In Chaucer's time, the phrase would have been pronounced as four syllables: 'gre-ne wo-de', where the schwa was pronounced as the 'a' in sofa or the 'u' in lucky.[27] The phrase 'grene wode' occurs thirteen times in Gest, and the silent final '-e' never needs to be pronounced in order to "keep the beat".[26]:271-2

Presence of new phraseology

As a replacement for the now-silent '-e', Ikegami points out that the Gest poet introduces a new phrase construct: adjective + adjective|noun + noun. Some examples (with the stressed syllables in bold font and in modern spelling) are:

The head and feathers of rich red gold            (line 1149)
                                           adj + adj + noun
The good white bread, the good red wine        (line 1571)
  adj + adj + noun            adj + adj + noun
Thou art one of the best sword men                  (line 674)
                                 adj + noun + noun


Gest of Robyn Hood,[8] (modern spelling)

Ikegami remarks that no works prior to 1400 have this phrasing.[26]:273-4 Rather, Gest's use of this phrasing is similar to that of The Floure and the Leafe, which is considered to have composed during the third quarter of the 15th century (c.1450–1475).[26]:279

Frequent use of 'long e' rhyme

The Gest poet uses several rhymes that only work if the modern 'long e' sound is used. Some examples, with only the rhyming words shown, follow:

be : yeomanry            (lines 178, 180)
he : courtesy              (lines 358, 360)
tree : company           (lines 1226, 1228)


Gest of Robyn Hood,[8] (modern spelling)

The modern 'long e' sound is considered to be one of the earliest changes associated with the Great Vowel Shift which began ca 1400.[26]:275-6

Rhyming 'all' with 'tale'

This rhyme[8]:lines 1422, 1424 only works after ca 1400. It is also associated with the Great Vowel shift.[26]:275

Evidence of Northern or East Midland dialect

Approximate locations of Old Ennglish dialects just prior to the Viking incursions. Most surviving Old English texts were written in the West Saxon dialect. Modern standard English (as spoken) descends mostly from the Mercian dialect, while the modern spelling derives from the West Saxon dialect of London.

The linguistic research begun by Skeat and his colleagues (as published in their various Middle English dictionaries) has been continued by modern linguists. Between 1898 and 1905, Joseph Wright published the seminal English Dialect Dictionary, based upon data collected by the English Dialect Society. The famous Survey of English Dialects was undertaken between 1950 and 1961.[28] Therefore, linguists have as detailed an understanding of the various Middle English dialects as the surviving literature and native speakers allow. The evidence for a Northern or East Midland dialect within the very words of Gest relies on the observation that, prior to standardization of English language spelling, Middle English authors spelled words as they were pronounced (that is, phonetically). Thus the rhyme words in each quatrain are also very valuable in determining whether or not regional dialects can be identified in Gest. The following is a very brief excerpt of Ikegami's findings; for complete details see his study[26]:276-8. The approximate pronunciations are from.[29]

Late ninth century extent of Danelaw and Old Norse. Note how the Danelaw included the eastern half of Mercian dialect region (indicated as 'Danish Mercia'), and the southern part of the Northumbrian dialect region (north of the Humber estuary).
Northern pronunciation
The Northern England dialect of Middle English (ME) results from a mixture of the Anglian dialects of Old English (OE) and the Old Norse (ON) of the Danelaw, with an overlay of Norman French.
  • The OE/ON vowel ā (long a) appears as ME /a:/ (pronounced roughly like the 'a' in father) in the rhyme pair hame:dame[8]:lines 594,596. The non-Northern vowel /ɔ:/ (pronounced roughly like 'aw' in law) appears in the rhyme pair more:before[8]:lines 986,988.
  • The OE/ON diphthong āg (equivalent to 'w') appears as ME /au/ (pronounced roughly like the 'ou' in house) in the rhyme pair lowe:shawe[8]:lines 1134,1136. The non-Northern ME diphthong /ɔu/ (pronounced roughly like the 'o' in bone) appears in the rhyme pair lowe:inowe[8]:lines 170,172.
Northern and Eastern Midlands pronunciation
The Eastern Midlands dialect of ME results from a mixture of the OE Mercian dialect and the ON of the Danelaw, with an overlay of Norman French.
  • There are two sequences of long vowel pronunciation changes which are characteristic of Northern and Eastern Midland dialects. The OE long vowel ǣ (pronounced roughly like the 'a' in mat) was raised to the ME long open vowel /ɛ:/ (pronounced roughly like the 'a' in hay), and raised again to ME close /e/ (pronounced roughly like the 'e' in bet). Similarly, the OE long vowel ā was also raised to ME long open vowel /ɛ:/, and then raised again to ME close /o:/ (pronounced roughly like the 'oa' in boat). These changes appear in the rhyme pairs: see:the[8]:lines 222,224; mone:none[8]:lines 254,256; do:theretoo[8]:lines 686,688; ere:chere[8]:lines 954,956.
  • Additional vowel pronunciations which are typical of the North and the East Midlands include OE short y appearing as /i/, pronounced roughly like the 'i' in bit (rhyme pair synne:in[8]:lines 38,40; and OE or ON long ȳ appearing as /i:/, pronounced roughly like the 'ee' in see (rhyme pair pryde:beside[8]:lines 86,88.

Historical analysis

Modern historical analysis of the internal historical evidence contained within Gest began in 1961 with Maurice Keen's The Outlaws of Medieval Legend,[30][Note 3] which compared the historical background of the Robin Hood ballads with other legendary and historical outlaw figures. Over the next four decades, various historians contributed to the debate on which historical periods were depicted in the Robin Hood ballads, and whether Robin Hood was based upon one or more actual persons.

During this period, D C Fowler,[31] published A Literary History of the Popular Ballad[2] as a modern update to Child's Ballads. He criticized Child's arrangement of the Robin Hood ballads, asserting that it encouraged their study without respect to their historical context, and that they were "admired in isolation".[2]:3-4 Following in Fowler's footsteps, this section focuses on the historical background of Gest and the earliest Robin Hood tales.[Note 4] Most of the Child Robin Hood ballads were composed later (some as late as the 17th century), and therefore are not relevant to this historical discussion.

The Linguistic analysis shows that Gest was compiled circa 1450–1475. The Literary analysis shows that the component tales were written down prior to 1450 from earlier oral forms which no longer exist. Therefore, this section looks at the external (actual) historical evidence from the 14th-15th centuries and compares it to the internal historical evidence of Gest.

External evidence

The 14th and 15th centuries were turbulent times for the people of England:

Historians refer to these times as the Crisis of the 14th century, or the Crisis of the Late Middle Ages. The timeline below attempts to summarize these historical events. It also includes dates which reflect the latest interpretations of Gest's internal evidence. To avoid cluttering the timeline with footnotes, some events (labeled as "most probable date" or "earliest text") are discussed and cited in Internal Evidence.

Selected Events
14th-century England

1272-1307:     reign of Edward I
1307-1327:     reign of Edward II
1315-1317:     Great Famine
1321:              famine in England
1321-1322:     Despenser War
1327:              commons now permanent part
                       of Parliament
1327-1377:     reign of Edward III
1333-1352:     poems of Minot composed
1337-1360:     Hundred Years War
                       (Edwardian Phase)
1345-1349:     The King and the Shepherd composed
                       (most probable date)
1347-1351:     Black Death (1st outbreak)
1349:              Ordinance of Labourers
1351:              famine in England
1351:              Statute of Laborers
1361-1362:     Black Death (2nd outbreak)
1369:              famine in England
1369:              Black Death (3rd outbreak)
1369-1389:     Hundred Years War
                       (Caroline Phase)
1375:              Treaty of Bruges (reversed
                       Edward III's French gains)
1376:              Good Parliament
                       (1st Speaker of Commons)
1377:              Richard II assumes throne
                       (age 10 years)
1381:              Peasants' Revolt
1386:              Lords Appellant govern England
1387:              Lords Appellant in armed rebellion
1388:              Merciless Parliament
1399:              Henry IV usurps throne

Selected Events
15th-century England

1400-1450:     poems of Minot (earliest text)
1413:              Statute of Additions
1413-1422:     reign of Henry V
1415-1453:     Hundred Years War
                       (Lancastrian phase)
1415:              Battle of Agincourt
1415-1461:     Gest compiled (most probable date)
1422:              Henry VI assumes throne
                       (age 9 months) (House of Lancaster)
1422-1437:     Regency Council ruled England
1429-1430:     freeholder voting rights
ca 1450:         "The King and the Shepherd"
                       (earliest text)
ca 1450:         "The King and the Hermit"
                       (earliest text)
after 1450:      "Robin Hood and the Monk"
                       (earliest text)
1455-1487:      Wars of the Roses
1461-1470:     first reign of Edward IV
                       (House of York)
1470-1471:     second reign of Henry VI
1471-1483:     second reign of Edward IV
1483:              reign of Edward V
                       (House of York)
1483-1485:     reign of Richard III
                       (House of York)
1485:              Battle of Bosworth Field
1485:              Henry VII assumed throne
                       (House of Tudor)
1493-1518:     "Gest" (earliest text)
ca 1500:         "Robin Hood and the Potter"
                       (earliest text)

An important external historical factor to consider is the gradual change in the meaning of the term yeoman, which is used repeatedly in Gest. During the 14th-15th centuries, between the time when the component tales were still in oral form and the time when Gest was compiled, the meaning of "yeoman" changed substantially.[32]:52-3 Originally, "yeoman" was a rank of noble household service as well as the chivalric rank between page and squire. By the late 14th century, it was also used to refer to freeborn and free tenure smallholders. During the 15th century, it began to refer to the growing social category (referred to as a "middling sort"[32]:55), consisting of the now land-wealthy commoner landowners and the land-poor younger sons of nobility. (Primogeniture dictated that only the eldest son could inherit the family estates.) This self-identification was re-inforced by the 1413 Statute of Additions under Henry V, in which those paying the polltax had to specify their status and occupation. Eventually, "yeoman" expanded to include husbandmen who practiced a trade or craft to supplement their farming income.[32]:52-3


Internal evidence

To address this spectrum of possible meanings of 'yeoman' over the centuries, Richard Almond and A. J. Pollard proposed that, within Gest, the 'yeoman' Robin Hood has to be studied (1) separately from the minor characters called "yeoman", and (2) separately from the 'yeoman' of the audience.[32]:56[Note 5] They referred to this confusion in the various meanings of 'yeoman' as the "slipperiness of social terminology" in the 15th century.[32]:75 However, their main source, Peter Coss, also considered another confusion factor which Almond and Pollard did not address: Gest was compiled from multiple source tales.[33]:71 Therefore, this section presents the various historical clues found within Gest in the context of Bessinger's outline (see here), and the possible source tales (see here),and the changing meanings of 'yeoman'.


Robin as yeoman of the forest?

Almond and Pollard credited J. C. Holt with being the first historian to recognize the connection between a yeoman and the forest.[32]:57 Based upon clues within the text, Almond and Pollard extended Holt's idea, and proposed that audiences of the 15th century would have recognized Robin Hood as being a forester of Barnsdale or Sherwood because of these clues:[32]:56-8

use of the phrase 'yeoman of the forest'
The phrase appears in Tale A, Episode 3 (Fourth Fytte)[8]:lines 881-884, and again in Tale C, Episode 1 (Seventh Fytte)[8]:lines 1505-1508. The former scene is when the Chief Steward insults Robin Hood by calling him a thief, to which Little John retorts that Robin is a 'yeoman of the forest'. The latter scene is when Robin Hood stops the disguised king, and introduces himself and his men as 'yeomen of the forest', now forced to dine on the King's deer. Almond and Pollard propose that the importance which appears to be attached to the phrase in these scenes indicate that Robin and his fellowship are more than mere outlaws taking refuge in the greenwood.[32]:58-9
Since both episodes are considered to have come from unrelated sources, it is perhaps significant the phrase only occurs in lines which can be attributed to the Gest poet as part of the set up for Episode 3 in Tale A, and for Episode 1 in Tale C.
Robin 'walking' in the forest
In Tale B, Episode 3 (Sixth Fytte)[8]:lines 1313-1316, Robin is described as walking in the forest, much to the chagrin of the Sheriff. Almond and Pollard suggest that "walking" should be interpreted in the sense of walking associated with an occupation, such as a "police officer walking his beat" meaning a police officer patroling his assigned area.[32]:60 This interpretation is supported by [10]:19-20 who described the foresters as sworn to protect the "vert and venison" within their assigned areas, which were known as divisions, wards, bailiwicks, or walks.
This phrase occurs after Robin and his men leave Sir Richard's castle, and before the Sheriff captures Sir Richard. It may be a part of a transition between fragments of two separate tales.
other 'good yeomen' who 'walk'
In Tale A, Episode 1 (First Fytte), Robin forbids his men to waylay "good yeoman/That walketh by green wood shawe [thicket]".[8]:lines 53-54 Almond and Pollard suggest that here Robin is referring to the other forest officals who were also yeomen: verderer, woodward, ranger, or agister.[32]:60
only a 'proud forester' can catch Robin
In Tale C, Episode 1 (Seventh Fytte)[8]:lines 1465-1480 only a "proud forester" in royal service knows how to track Robin down. And that was by disguising the King as an abbot and five of his bodyguards as monks; in other words, it takes a forester to catch a forester.[32]:61 It is unknown if this opening fragment is from a now-lost tale or part of the Gest poet's transition between the Sixth and Seventh Fyttes.
Robin's knowledge of royal hunt rituals
Forest feast under the tryst tree. Minature from le Livre de chasse.

Almond and Pollard have traced some of the hunting rituals and terminology found in Gest back to The Master of Game, a hunting book translated in 1413 from French by Edward, Duke of York.[32]:64-66 They point out that in all the English-language 15th-century hunting literature, 'yeoman' is used consistently to refer to the hunt and forest officals.[32]:65

"Bow and stable" was the hunting technique in which herds of deer are driven by foresters and professional huntsmen towards the stationary noble hunters. The tryst tree is where the noble huntsman stood, with his bowbearer and his hound handlers, to await the deer being flushed toward them. Sometimes a lodge or hut made of green boughs would be built at the tryst for shelter as well as camouflage.[32]:64-66

Ritual butchery under the tryst tree. Minature from le Livre de chasse.

Almond and Pollard compare the 'royal' dinner prepared by Robin for the disguised King in Tale C, Episode 1 (Seventh Fytte)[8]:lines 1545-1576 to that described in The Master of Game. Believing the abbot to be the King's emissary since he carries the Privy Seal, Robin invites him to a royal hunt. Robin escorts his honored guest by the hand (as is required of the yeoman of the bow) to the tryst tree. There the deer are slain and ritually butchered (dyghtande is a northern England term for the ritual).[8]:lines 1533-1576 The butchering is done by Robin himself for the disguised King, who was given the prime cuts of venison, along with bread and wine.[32]:66-9

In Gest, the huntsman's hut serves as the tryst tree for the dinners with the Knight in Tale A, Episode 1 (First Fytte) and the Chief Steward of St Mary's in Tale A, Episode 3a (Fourth Fytte). The Knight is given swan and pheasant, a noble's repast, but also the numbles, which was traditionally reserved for the foresters and the huntsmen.[32]:68-9

This royal (or noble) hunt familiarity may indicate that the Gest poet was a member of either a royal or noble household. Or it may indicate that hunting tales were part of his repertoire. Or both. Coss proposes that the Gest poet had a fairly large body of source material from which to choose. And since he chose to weave his sources together, rather than lay them end-to-end, it is difficult to untangle the now-lost tales which he used.[33]:71-2

Comparison with Chaucer's Yeoman
Deer hunting scene. Minature from le Livre de chasse (1387-89)

Almond and Pollard also credited J. C. Holt as the first historian to notice the resemblance between Robin Hood and Geoffrey Chaucer's The Knight's Yeoman in The Canterbury Tales.[32]:62-3 But Holt never realized the significance of the Yeoman's accoutrements: his green coat and hood, his bow and arrows; his buckler and sword; and his horn attached to a green baldric. All of which indicated the Yeoman was a forester and huntsman; a position with which Chaucer was certainly familiar. He served as forester of North Petherton Park in Somersetshire for the last decade of his life.[34]:xl

The green livery of the forester and huntsman is depicted in many of the miniatures of the Livre de chasse, written by Gaston III, Count of Foix, in the late 14th century.[32]:63

The minor yeoman characters

Tale A yeomen
Much, the Miller's son, and Will Scarlock, are both described as yeomen in Episode 1 (First Fytte), as they stand on the Saylis looking for Robin's guest.[8]:line 78 When combined with Robin's description of his men as 'yeomen of the forest' in Tale C, Episode 1 (Seventh Fytte), the implication is that they are both foresters.(See above.)
In Episode 3a (Sencond Fytte), the young men participating in the wrestling match are described as yeomen.[8]:lines 539-540 But since no details are given, the exact meaning is uncertain.[33]:74
Tale B yeomen
In Episode 1 (Third Fytte), Robin welcomes Little John back to the greenwood, and refers to the Sheriff's cook as a "fair yeoman".[8]:line 709 Robin probably recognized the cook's clothing as being from the Sheriff's household. 'Yeoman' was a service rank in the household kitchen.[33]:74
Tale C yeomen
In Episode 2 (Eighth Fytte), the townspeople of Nottingham are called "both yeomen and knaves".[8]:line 1714 Here 'yeomen' refers to the tradesmen,[33]:74 and knaves refers to the common laborers.[35]:sense 3
Little John as yeoman and knave
In Tale A, Episode 1 (First Fytte), Little John is introduced as a "good yeoman" standing next to Robin.[8]:line 12 Throughout Gest, Little John refers to Robin as his master.[8]:lines 19, 41, 99, 101-2, 277, 281, 297, 705, 825, 881-2 He also demonstrates a courtesy equal to that of Robin's in his interactions with the Sorrowful Knight[8]:lines 93-4 and the disguised King.[8]:line 1568

At the end of Episode 1, Robin offers Little John's service to the Sorrowful Knight as knave, who can serve as a yeoman in time of need.[8]:lines 322-323 Here the meaning of 'knave' is an attendant,[35]:sense 2 and 'yeoman' refers to the military (chivalric) rank.[36]:sense 1

In Tale B, Episode 1 (Third Fytte), Little John, in the guise of Reynold Greenleaf the knave, inflitrates the Sheriff's household in order to wreak vengeance on the Sheriff.[8]:lines 611-16

Which King Edward?

Almond and Pollard's approach coincides neatly with the results of Thomas Ohlgren's study of 'which' King Edward is meant in Gest. Ohlgren asserts that the individual tales were composed during the early decades of the reign of Edward III (r 1327–1377). He bases his assertion on internal evidence (references made in the text) concerning feudalism, livery and maintenance, and other details that can be traced back to Edward III's reign.[12]:2 Ohlgren proposes that Gest was compiled from these individual tales during the reign of Henry V (1413–1422) or Henry VI (first reign 1422–1461).[12]:2 He uses the example of the 14th-century political poems of Lauence Minot, whose poems were recopied during Henry V's reign to celebrate Henry's victories in France. Similarly, some of the Robin Hood tales which referred to Edward III could have been compiled as Gest. Ohlgren argues that cultural references made in the original tales would only be understood by an audience who was no more than two or three generations later than Edward III.[12]:26-8 To support his assertion, Ohlgren considers clues which can be found within the text of Gest.

"Edward our comely King"[8]:line 1412
The king is referred to as "Edward, our comely king". But which King Edward is it? The epithet is the first clue. Olhgren recently discovered a similar epithet in the political poetry written by Laurence Minot in the 14th century. Minot composed poems in Middle English celebrating the victories of Edward III, including those against the Scots (Battle of Halidon Hill in 1333) and against the French (Siege of Guînes (1352)). They were probably written not long after the events, but eleven of his political poems were revised ca 1352 to form a continous narrative. They were popular enough to have been recopied during the reign of Henry V or Henry VI (our earliest surviving text is dated to 1425-50).[37][12]:? Minot's poem IV begins:

Edward, our comely king
in Brabant has his dwelling
with many comely knight.[38]

Ohlgren considered this significant, as only two works are known to use the phrase "Edward our comely king": Minot's poem IV and Gest. By itself, this evidence is not convincing; but the other three clues, which are inter-related, add weight to his argument.
"far beyond the sea/In England right"[8]:lines 353-54
In Tale A, Episode 2 (Second Fytte), the greedy Abbot is gloating that this is the Knight's last day to repay his debt, then his lands will be forfeit. The kind-hearted Prior rebukes the Abbot:

The knight is far beyond the sea,
In England right,
And suffer hunger and cold,
And many a sorry night.[8]:lines 353-356

"Far beyond the sea" has been usually intepreted as the Knight being on crusade or a pilgrimage[20]:192-93, but Ohlgren considers it to mean that the Knight was fighting in France at the beginning of the Hundred Years War. "In England right" was the rallying cry for Edward III's legal claim to certain territories in France - and to the French throne. The phrase appears 4 times in Minot's poems, and it always refers to Edward's legal claim.[12]:8-9[38]:poem I, line 31[38]:poem III, lines 5-7[38]:poem IV, lines 49-51[38]:poem VIII, lines 36-7
"Saint Quentin"[8]:line 1258
In Tale B, Episode 2 (Fifth Fytte), Sir Richard at the Lee shelters Robin and his fellowship from the Sheriff's posse comitatus:

For one thing, Robin, I thee promise;
I swear by Saint Quentin,
These forty days thou dwellest with me,
To soup, eat, and dine.[8]:lines 1257-1260

Sir Richard swears by Saint Quentin to house Robin for forty days. Saint Quentin was a 3rd century Christian martyr whose pilgrimage cult at the Basilica of Saint-Quentin in Saint-Quentin, Aisne flourished during the Middle Ages. Saint-Quentin is not far from Thiérache, site of the first encounter between Edward III and Philip VI of France during the chevauchée of 1339.
Possible source tales for the Seventh Fytte
Ohlgren draws attention to two tales which are considered part of the "King and Subject" tradition as described by Child: King Edward and Shepherd (hereafter called Shepherd) and King and Hermit (hereafter called Hermit). Both tales were mentioned by Child as part of his discussion of King Edward the Fourth and a Tanner of Tamworth (#273).[Child, V, p ??] Curiously, Child included Tanner, which survives as a 17th century text, but he does not include either Shepherd or Hermit, both of which survive as incomplete manuscripts dated ca 1450. In Olgren's study of the two tales, he has concluded that there is nothing "to preclude their having been used as the sources for the 'King and the Subject' theme in Gest."[12]:12
Shepherd is preserved as part of the same manuscript which contains Robin Hood and the Monk. Shepherd unambiguously describes Edward III as the King:[12]:10
"Hermit" is preserved ...
Shepherd and Hermit share plot similarities: a disguised king who seeks out his subjects to listen to their complaints; he dines on what turns out to be a dinner consisting of poached venison and fowl; the subject engages the king in a drinking game; the king invites the subject to court, where the king's true identity is revealed.[12]:10 Both tales contain interesting plot details which parallel Gest:[12]:11
  • In Shepherd, a hand-washing ritual occurs prior to the feast at court; in Gest the ritual occurs prior to Robin's meals with the Knight and with the Monk.
  • The first meal provided by the Shepherd to the King is similar to that provided by Robin to the Knight.
  • The second meal provided by the Shepherd to his King is similar to the meal provided by Robin to his King.
  • In Hermit, the King is lured into the forest by the promise of a great-headed deer. The incident occurs five miles from Nottingham. In Gest, this is similar to Little John's ruse to lure the Sheriff into the greenwood, in which Little John runs five miles to the Sheriff's hunting party with news of a great green hart.
Cultural memory of Edward III
Shepherd and Hermit, as well as the political poems of Minot, are examples of a cultural memory of Edward III which still existed some three or four generations after his death. (This cultural memory may have been encouraged by Henry IV, a grandson of Edward III, who had usurped the throne from Richard II, son of Edward the Black Prince, in 1399.) Edward was remembered as having concern for his subjects, and was committed to redressing injustices committed by his officials.[12]:12
Another popular text was the "De reginine principum", which was translated (1411-12) into Middle English by Privy Seal clerk Thomas Hoccleve as the Regiment of Princes. Hoccleve addressed his poem to Henry of Monmouth, Prince of Wales and Duke of Lancaster (the future Henry V). Henry IV was in poor health, and his son had taken over the reins of government in 1410. In the Regiment of Princes, Hoccleve included many references to Edward's personal life and events of his time. Hoccleve advices Henry to personally find out what his subjects think of him in the section "Of Justice". Like "Edward the last", Henry should travel among his subjects "in simple array alone" "To hear what men said of thy person" (modern spelling).[12]:12 The King is obligated to help them. If his officals are oppressing the people, he is to redress the wrongs done.

Sir Richard as army recruiter?

Ohlgren draws attention to the Knight's activities during the year before his 400-pound debt repayment is due to Robin Hood in Tale A, Episode 2 (Second Fytte). The Knight's income from his lands is only 400 pounds, so how is he paying for the men and equipment?

Ohlgren proposes that the money could have come from two sources: indenture and purveyance.[12]:5-8 Indenture was started by Edward I as a way of supplementing the number of troops raised through the feudal (tenure) levies, but it became almost standard practice under Edward III, who used it to recruit the rank and file of his armies.[1954_Lyon, p 503-4] In the 14th-15th centuries, purveyance[MED, sense 3, 4] meant recruiting men, clothing them, furnishing the equipment for a campaign, and providing food and transportation for them to the English coast. The 100 men-at-arms mentioned in the text don't seem to have been the Knight's personal retinue, the uniforms being red and white. These colors belonged to Richard Fitzalan, 3rd Earl of Arundel, who served in almost all of Edward III's French campaigns. Recruiting and outfitting these men could have earned the Knight between 250 and 650 pounds.[12]:7

Livery and fees

Thoughout Gest, there are several references to the expanded use of livery and fees during the 14th-15th centuries.[15]:235-6

The following incidents indicate that Robin bestowed liveries upon his men (or at least provided the cloth). This was considered acceptable practice during wartime under the terms of the indentures with Robin, who is considered a yeoman leader of men.[12]:17

Robin Hood and the Knight
In Tale A, Episode 1 (First Fytte), Robin Hood agrees to provide livery to the threadbare Knight. Little John then measures out a generous three yards of scarlet and raye (striped)[MED_raye] cloth, which he hands over to the Knight.[8]:lines 276-296
Little John and the Cook
In Tale B, Episode 1 (Third Fytte), on Robin's behalf, Little John offers to the Cook twenty marks and two sets of clothing per year as incentive to join Robin's fellowship.[8]:lines 676-682
Robin and King Edward
In Tale C, Episode 2, (Eighth Fytte), King Edward asks to purchase from Robin green cloth to replace their gray monk's robes.[8]:lines 1669-1676
Robin at Edward's court
In Tale C, Episode 2 (Eighth Fytte), Robin has spent all his wealth on fees for his men.[8]:lines 1729-1736
Sheriff and Little John
In Tale B, Episode 1 (Third Fytte), the Sheriff offers to retain Little John as a member of his household for 20 marks per year.[8]:lines 597-600

However, the most prominent incident is the illegal practice of 'cloth and fee' described in Tale A, Episode 2 (Second Fytte). 'Cloth & fee' refers to the payment of money and gifts of clothing to the King's justice for legal services.[8]:line 426 Note This practice was so prevalent that, in 1346, Edward III issued a statute requiring his justices to swear an oath that they would only accept 'cloth and fee' from the King himself.[8]:line 425 Note, line 426 Note In this episode, the Abbot is trying to defraud the Knight of his land, so he retains, via 'cloth and fee', a County Justice, the King's officer, to force the issue in his favor.[8]:lines 371-372, 425-426 Once the Abbot has publicly insulted the Knight, the Chief Justice seeks to defuse the situation by suggesting the Abbot offer to purchase the land outright.[8]:lines 465-66, 465 Note The ridiculously low price offered by the Abbot is yet another insult to the Knight, which prompts the Knight to empty the bag of Robin's 400 pounds onto the Abbot's table. The Knight then declares to all present to bear witness to the fact that he has redeemed his land legally. [15]:235-6

Peasants' revolt of 1381

Most of the initial historical interpretations placing Gest during the 14th century were based upon a misreading of Child's discussion of a possible date of composition for Gest. Child placed his conclusion ("There are no firm grounds on which to base an opinion.") at the end of a lengthy discussion in which he unsuccessfully attempted to date Gest to 1400 or earlier.[14]:40 Some scholars[20]:37-38 had proposed that since Piers Plowman is connected with the Peasants' revolt, and since the priest Sloth mentions "rymes of Robyn Hode", then Robin Hood is also connected. Langland gives no indication as to what these rhymes are. There are no surviving rhymes from Langland's lifetime, so we don't know how Langland's audience would have reacted to this remark. There is no internal evidence that the source tales used by the Gest poet were concerned with the peasants' issues.[20]:37-38

According to Richard Almond and A. J. Pollard[32]:55-6, the association between Robin Hood and the issues of the Peasants' Revolt was first made by Rodney Hilton in 1958,[39] when he described Robin Hood as "a free peasant representing peasant ideology for a peasant audience"[32]:55. However, in 1961, J. C. Holt rebutted Hilton, asserting that the Robin Hood tales were composed in castle and manor halls,[40] a position Holt expanded upon in his book.[20] Since then, a consensus has emerged that Robin Hood represented a new social group above the peasants and below those who bore a coat of arms, a group which is often referred to as the "middling sort".[32]:56

Forest law

In Gest, several references to Robin Hood's fellowship poaching the King's deer are mentioned as passing remarks, and never further developed in the tales:

  • when itemizing the Knight's dinner menu in Tale A, Episode 1 (First Fytte)[8]:lines 127-132, and the King's dinner menu in Tale C, Episode 1 (Seventh Fytte)[8]:lines 1569-1572
  • in the transition between the Sixth and Seventh Fyttes, the Gest poet speaks of how King Edward travelled throughout Lancashire, without seeing the usual large herds of deer[8]:lines 1425-1432
  • when Robin Hood accosts the disguised King Edward in Tale C, Episode 1 (Seventh Fytte)[8]:lines 1507-1508

Furthermore, the Gest poet never explains why Robin Hood is an outlaw, nor why the Sheriff of Nottingham is a special target. It's as though an explanation is not needed by the audience of that time. In the earliest tales,[Note 4] Robin Hood is already an outlaw. An early life of Robin Hood did not appear until Ritson's 1795 anthology,[41]:2-10 which was a collection of fictitious detail[20]:44-5

Importance as an English ballad

Gest was originally classified by F J Child as an early example of a Middle English language ballad, based upon its quatrain structure and rhyme scheme. Since the publication of Child's anthology, various scholars have attempted to construct a classification for the ballads. Gest, along with the Border ballads, and the other Robin Hood ballads, have been recognized as being distinct from the other Child ballads. They are narratives, which generally lack a chorus or refrain, and appear to have been composed as recitations before an audience. Only Gest is considered comparable to the Danish and English heroic ballads,[Note 6] the epic poem Beowulf, and the great Middle English romances - Havelok the Dane and The Tale of Gamelyn.[42][7]

Importance to English Romantic literature

With the rise of English Romanticism in the late 18th century came a resurgence in the popularity of the Robin Hood ballads. Gest was reprinted several times as part of various anthologies. The first was Thomas Percy's 1765 Reliques of Ancient English Poetry. But the most notable was Robin Hood: A collection of all the Ancient Poems Songs and Ballads now extant, relative to that celebrated Outlaw, edited by Joseph Ritson in 1795 (followed by two more editions in 1832 and 1885).

Ivanhoe

Sandyknowe Farm in the Scottish Borders

Walter Scott, a Scottish poet, is regarded to have started the 19th century medieval revival.[43]:315 But it was his Waverley novels, particularly Ivanhoe, which pioneered the historical romance genre.[44] Scott's fascination with the stories and ballads of the Scottish Borders began in 1773 when he moved to his grandparents' farm, Sandyknowe, at Smailholm near Kelso. He was recovering from a bout of polio and his parents thought he would recover with fresh air and exercise.[45] When he couldn't go outside, he would read. Percy's 1765 Reliques of Ancient English Poetry became one of Scott's favorites.[46] After returning to Edinburgh, he studied law, and was admitted to the Faculty of Advocates in 1792. Scott was Curator of the Advocates Library between 1795-1799 and 1805–1809. Sometime prior to 1788, the Advocates Library was given the volume known as the Chapman and Myllar prints, which contains the Antwerp edition of Gest (text a). In 1808 it appears that Scott was involved in having the volume taken to London and re-bound.[47][48] Scott was a friend to John Ritson, and encouraged him to complete his 1795 collection of Robin Hood ballads, which contains a transcription of the de Worde edition of Gest (text b). He keenly appreciated Ritson's editorial emphasis on textual accuracy, and used Ritson's anthology to invent the character of Locksley in Ivanhoe.[49]

Echoes from Gest can be found throughout Ivanhoe: in its various locations in the West Riding of Yorkshire; in the use of elements of Gest in key scenes at the Tournament of Ashby; and in Scott's re-use of the Gest poet's feasting scene motif to highlight important plot twists.

Adaptations

Gest has influenced modern versions of the Robin Hood tales, but not as much as the other Robin Hood ballads. The adaption which bears obvious traces is the popular boy's book written by Howard Pyle in 1883. Pyle's book was later a huge influence on how Hollywood would portray Robin Hood.

Howard Pyle's Merry Adventures

Howard Pyle's contribution to the Robin Hood revival of the 19th century was his richly illustrated children's book The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood. Following in the footsteps of Walter Scott, Pyle had Robin Hood roaming Sherwood Forest (not Barnsdale) during the reign of King Richard the Lion-heart (not comely King Edward).

Merry Adventures

He was a good stout knight, but sorrowful of face and downcast of mien. His clothes were plain and rich, but no chain of gold, such as folk of his stand in life wore at most times, hung around his neck, and no jewel was about him; yet no one could mistake him for aught but one of proud and noble blood. His head was bowed upon his breast and his hands drooped limp on either side; and so he came slowly riding, as though sunk in sad thoughts, whilst even his good horse, the reins loose upon his neck, walked with hanging head, as though he shared his master's grief.

Pyle, Part Fifth, Chapter I[50]:159

Gest

All dreary was his semblance,
And little was his pride;
His one foot in the stirrup stood,
That other waved beside.

His hood hanged in his eyes two;
He rode in simple array,
A sorrier man than he was one
Rode never in summer day."

Unknown, Fytte 1[8]:lines 85-92

The Sorrowful Knight tale is related in Chapters I-II of Part Fifth.[50]:157-184 The story is barely recognizable from that in Gest (Pyle replaced most of Fytte 1 with his own version of how the Knight received his money; not from Robin, but from the Bishop of Hereford, who "conveniently" came to Robin's feast). Pyle (an artist from Wilmington DE) was writing for a juvenile audience, emphasized prose descriptions that are as richly detailed as his drawings. However, the Gest poet performs the same description much more economically.

Merry Adventures

"Marry," quoth Robin, "that is a question hard to answer. One man calleth me kind, another calleth me cruel; this one calleth me good, honest fellow, and that one vile thief. Truly, the world hath as many eyes to look upon a man withal as there are spots on a toad; so, with what pair of eyes thou regardest me lieth entirely with thine own self. My name is Robin Hood."

Pyle, Part Fifth, Chapter I[50]:160

Gest

"He is good yeoman," said the knight,
"Of him I have heard much good.' [8]:lines 103-4

"He is a strong thief," sayd the monk,
"Of him heard I never good." [8]:lines 883-4

Unknown, Fytte 1, Fytte 2

Pyle does capture the light-hearted tone of the Gest poet when the Knight asks, who stops a traveller on the King's highway. Robin's response recalls the reactions of the Sorrowful Knight (in Fytte 1) and the Monk of St Mary's (in Fytte 2) upon hearing Robin's name.

Pyle ends his tale of the Sorrowful Knight with words that echo the "lyth and listen" formulaic of the Gest poet:

Now listen, and you shall next hear of certain merry adventures that befell Robin Hood and Little John...[50]:184

Notes

  1. The West Derby Forest, located in the hundred of West Derby in Lancashire, was often referred to as Derbyshire (see page 98 in Cox's The Royal Forests of England). This article assumes that the Derbyshire in the sheriff's title refers to the historic county Derbyshire.
  2. There is an unresolved debate among those who study the history of ballads. Those who favor the position that ballads originated as communal songs and dances are known as communalists; those who support the opposing position that ballads were written by individual authors are known as individualists. (See the Composition section under Ballad.) This debate involved questions that have since been "discarded as subjects for fruitful inquiry" (see Roger D Abrahams' review of Anglo-American Folksong Scholarship since 1898 by D K Wilgus). The current consensus is that, since so little is known about the origins of the earliest ballads, their origins can only be deduced from clues within the texts themselves; that is, on a case-by-case basis. It was advocated by the English historian J R Maddicott in a series of articles in the journal Past & Present (1958-61) and re-iterated in 1978 in his "Birth and Setting of the Ballads of Robin Hood".
    Independent support for minstrel origins was offered by historian Maurice Keen in the Introduction to his second edition (1977) of The Outlaws of Medieval Legend. Keen stated that criticism forced him to abandon his original arguments that the ballad form of the Robin Hood stories indicated a primitive popular origin.(p xiii) He now supported the position that the narrative ballads were minstrel compositions. Unfortunately, he never revised the pertinent chapters (XI and XIV) to reflect his new position.
  3. It is important that the third edition (1987) or later be consulted. For the second edition (1977), Keen did not revise his chapter contents; instead he described his updates in a Introduction: some recantations (p xiii-xxi). Similarly, for the third edition (1987), he discussed his reactions to the then-latest scholarship in Appendix IV: Robin Hood in recent historical writing (1977-86): A Postscript (p 228-234). As a result, there may be 2 separate references to the same edition for a single citation: one pointing to his latest positions as described in his Introduction and/or Postscript. The original text of the original chapters are not cited, as they are considered to be obsolete.
  4. Gest (Child 117), ca 1493-1518, is considered as one of the three oldest Robin Hood tales in Child's anthology. The other two are Robin Hood and the Monk (Child 119), ca after 1450, and Robin Hood and the Potter (Child 121), ca 1500. Two incomplete tales dated to ca 1450, The King and the Shepherd and The King and the Hermit, are also compared with Gest, but were not included in Child's anthology. A ballad sometimes compared with Gest is Adam Bell, Clim of the Clough, and William of Cloudesley (Child 116), ca 1557.
  5. Their study examined what they considered as the earliest Robin Hood tales: Gest; Robin Hood and the Monk; Robin Hood and the Potter; and Robin Hood and Guy of Gisborne.
  6. Hart's analysis included the following as heroic ballads:

References

  1. Clawson, William Hall (1909). The gest of Robin Hood (1 ed.). Toronto CA: University of Toronto library. Archived from the original on 23 September 2008. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  2. Fowler, D C, ed. (1968). A Literary History of the Popular Ballad (1 ed.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Archived from the original on 30 November 2011. Retrieved 27 December 2021.
  3. Dobson, R B; Taylor, John, eds. (1989). Rymes of Robyn Hood: an Introduction to the English Outlaw. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  4. Ohlgren, Thomas H; Knight, Stephen Thomas, eds. (1997). Robin Hood and Other Outlaw Tales. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University. ISBN 9781879288928.
  5. "The Robin Hood Project". The Robin Hood Project. University of Rochester. 2021. Archived from the original on 14 Nov 2020. Retrieved 27 December 2021.
  6. Ohlgren, Thomas H; Matheson, Lister M, eds. (2013). Early Rymes of Robyn Hood An Edition of the Texts, Ca. 1425 to Ca. 1600 (1st ed.). Tempe AZ: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies. ISBN 9780866984768.
  7. Bessinger Jr, J B (1999). "The Gest of Robin Hood Revisited". In Knight, Stephen (ed.). Robin Hood: An Anthology of Scholarship and Criticism. Cambridge UK: D S Brewer. ISBN 0 85991 525 5.
  8. "A Gest of Robyn Hode". The Robin Hood Project. University of Rochester. 2021. Archived from the original on 14 Nov 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
  9. Craigie, W A; Bradley, Henry; Onions, C T, eds. (1928). A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles: Founded Mainly on the Materials Collected by the Philological Society. Vol. 10 part 2 (1 ed.). Oxford UK: Clarendon Press. Archived from the original on 23 January 2007. Retrieved 7 January 2022.
  10. Cox, J Charles (1905). The Royal Forests of England (1 ed.). London, UK: Methuen & Co. Archived from the original on 16 January 2007. Retrieved 6 January 2022.
  11. Craigie, W A; Bradley, Henry; Onions, C T, eds. (1928). A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles: Founded Mainly on the Materials Collected by the Philological Society. Vol. 10 part 2 (1 ed.). Oxford UK: Clarendon Press. Archived from the original on 23 January 2007. Retrieved 7 January 2022.
  12. Ohlgren, Thomas (2000). "Edwardus redivivus in a "Gest of Robyn Hode"". The Journal of English and Germanic Philology. 99 (1): 1–28. JSTOR 27711904. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  13. "A Gest of Robyn Hode: Introduction". The Robin Hood Project. University of Rochester. 2021. Archived from the original on 23 October 2021. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  14. Child, Francis James, ed. (1888). "117 A GEST OF ROBYN HODE". The English and Scottish popular ballads. Vol. 3, part V (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin. p. 39. Archived from the original on 29 September 2006. Retrieved 27 December 2021.
  15. Maddicott, J R (1999). "Birth and Setting of the Ballads of Robin Hood". In Knight, Stephen (ed.). Robin Hood: An Anthology of Scholarship and Criticism (1 ed.). Cambridge, England: D S Brewer. ISBN 0 85991 525 5.
  16. "The Chepman and Myllar prints". The Spread of Scottish Printing. Library of Scotland. 2008. Archived from the original on 31 December 2021. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  17. "Provenance and binding". First Scottish Books. Library of Scotland. 2006. Archived from the original on 31 December 2021. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  18. "A Gest of Robin Hood (pp.197-220 in the volume) (Page 1 of 24)". First Scottish Books. National Library of Scotland. 2006. Archived from the original on 31 December 2021. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  19. Gray, Douglas (1999). "The Robin Hood Poems". In Knight, Stephen (ed.). Robin Hood: An Anthology of Scholarship and Criticism (1 ed.). Cambridge, England: D S Brewer. pp. 3–37. ISBN 0 85991 525 5.
  20. Holt, J. C. (1996) [1989]. Robin Hood Revised and enlarged edition. London: Thames & Hudson, Ltd. ISBN 0-500-27541-6.
  21. Jones, H S V (1910). "Review: The Gest of Robin Hood by W. H. Clawson". The Journal of English and Germanic Philology. 9 (3): 430–432. JSTOR 27700048. Retrieved 15 March 2022.
  22. Skeat, Walter William; Mayhew, Anthony Lawson, eds. (1888). A Concise Dictionary of Middle English from A.D. 1150 to 1580 (1 ed.). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. Archived from the original on 17 February 2008. Retrieved 27 December 2021.
  23. Skeat, Walter William, ed. (1888). An etymological dictionary of the English language (2 ed.). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. Archived from the original on 13 December 2006. Retrieved 27 December 2021.
  24. Skeat, Walter W (1911). English dialects from the eighth century to the present day (1 ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Archived from the original on 13 December 2006. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  25. "WILLIAM HALL CLAWSON (1879-1964)". RPO Representative Poetry online. University of Toronto Libraries. Archived from the original on 11 May 2021. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  26. Ikegami, Masa (1995). "The Language and the Date of "A Gest of Robyn Hode"". Neuphilologische Mitteilungen. 96 (3): 271–281. JSTOR 43346104. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
  27. "Tips & Tricks for Pronouncing Middle English" (PDF). Folgerpedia. Folger Shakespeare Library. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 May 2021. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  28. "English dialect study – an overview". Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. 2022. Archived from the original on 19 March 2022. Retrieved 25 March 2022.
  29. "INTERNATIONAL PHONETIC ALPHABET CHART: VOWELS" (PDF). Dr. Wheeler's Website. Carson-Newman University. 2018. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 January 2022. Retrieved 22 March 2022.
  30. Keen, Maurice (1989). The Outlaws of Medieval Legend (3rd ed.). New York: Dorset Press. ISBN 0-88029-454-X.
  31. "David C. Fowler papers, 1936-1992". Archives West. Portland, OR: Orbis Cascade Alliance. 1 January 2020. Archived from the original on 27 February 2022. Retrieved 27 February 2022.
  32. Almond, Richard; Pollard, A J (February 2001). "The Yeomanry of Robin Hood and Social Terminology in Fifteenth-Century England". Past & Present. Oxford University Press (170): 52–77. JSTOR 3600794. Retrieved 10 April 2022.
  33. Coss, P. R. (August 1985). "Aspects of Cultural Diffusion in Medieval England: The Early Romances, Local Society and Robin Hood". Past & Present. 108: 35–79. JSTOR 650573. Retrieved 30 April 2022.
  34. Skeat, Rev Walter W., ed. (1894). "Life of Chaucer". The complete works of Geoffrey Chaucer; edited from numerous manuscripts. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. hdl:2027/uc1.31158011312096. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
  35. "Middle English Dictionary". Middle English Compendium. University of Michigan Library. 2000–2018. Retrieved 1 May 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  36. "Middle English Dictionary". Middle English Compendium. University of Michigan Library. 2000–2018. Retrieved 1 May 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  37. Osberg, Richard H (1996). "The Poems of Laurence Minot 1333-1352: Introduction". TEAMS Middle English Texts. University of Rochester. Archived from the original on 17 November 2021. Retrieved 11 April 2022.
  38. Minot, Laurence (1996). Osberg, Richard H (ed.). "The Poems of Laurence Minot 1333-1352". TEAMS Middle English Texts. University of Rochester. Archived from the original on 17 November 2021. Retrieved 11 April 2022.
  39. Hilton, R. H. (November 1958). "The Origins of Robin Hood". Past & Present. 14: 30–44. JSTOR 650091. Retrieved 27 April 2022.
  40. Holt, J. C. (November 1960). "The Origins and Audience of the Ballads of Robin Hood". Past & Present. 18: 89–110. JSTOR 649889. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
  41. Ritson, Joseph (1884). "The Life of Robin Hood". Robin Hood: a collection of all the ancient poems, songs and ballads, now extant, relative to that celebrated English outlaw (1 ed.). New York: George Routledge and Sons. Archived from the original on 25 January 2020. Retrieved 28 April 2022.
  42. Clawson, William Hall (1908). "Ballad and Epic". The Journal of American Folklore. American Folklore Society. 21 (82): 349–361. JSTOR 534582. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
  43. Chandler, Alice (1965). "Sir Walter Scott and the Medieval Revival". Nineteenth-Century Fiction. 19 (4): 315–332. JSTOR 2932872. Retrieved 7 February 2022.
  44. "Scott the Novelist". Walter Scott. Edinburgh University Library. 2007. Archived from the original on 3 January 2022. Retrieved 14 February 2022.
  45. "Sandyknowe and Early Childhood". Walter Scott. Edinburgh University Library. 2003. Archived from the original on 3 January 2022. Retrieved 1 February 2022.
  46. "School and University". Walter Scott. Edinburgh University Library. 2011. Archived from the original on 3 January 2022. Retrieved 14 February 2022.
  47. "Provenance and binding Further discussion about the acquisition by the Advocates Library". First Scottish Books. Library of Scotland. 2006. Archived from the original on 23 January 2021. Retrieved 1 February 2022.
  48. "Provenance and binding Further discussion about Hering's binding". First Scottish Books. Library of Scotland. 2006. Archived from the original on 23 January 2021. Retrieved 1 February 2022.
  49. "Ivanhoe". Walter Scott. Edinburgh University Library. 2003. Archived from the original on 24 January 2022. Retrieved 5 February 2022.
  50. Pyle, Howard (1883). The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood of Great Renown in Nottinghamshire (1 ed.). New York NY: Charles Scribner's Sons. Archived from the original on 28 September 2006. Retrieved 26 January 2022.

Further reading

Contemporary criticism of Wilgus' survey of ballad scholarship
Contemporary criticism of Clawson's analysis
Hart's classification of Child's ballads according to the complexity and elaboration of the narrative
Description of original sources stored at The National Archives, Kew


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.